FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value in Latvia

Latvia: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value was 156.19 1000 No in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
156.19 1000 No
Change on year
up 0.7%
World rank
111th
of 145 countries
All-time high
380.78 1000 No
in 2000
All-time low
145.83 1000 No
in 2021
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value in Latvia, 2000–2023

01002003004002000201120232000: 380.8 1000 No2001: 313.8 1000 No2002: 333.9 1000 No2003: 300.5 1000 No2004: 292.9 1000 No2005: 278.9 1000 No2006: 285.2 1000 No2007: 269.5 1000 No2008: 230.1 1000 No2009: 197.9 1000 No2010: 186.2 1000 No2011: 190.7 1000 No2012: 198.2 1000 No2013: 192 1000 No2014: 192.1 1000 No2015: 192.9 1000 No2016: 191.6 1000 No2017: 179.6 1000 No2018: 184.4 1000 No2019: 172.1 1000 No2020: 168.6 1000 No2021: 145.8 1000 No2022: 155.1 1000 No2023: 156.2 1000 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value in Latvia stood at 156.19 1000 No.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.7% on the previous year and down 18.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value in Latvia peaked at 380.78 1000 No in 2000 and was at its lowest, 145.83 1000 No, in 2021.

That places Latvia 111th out of 145 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value in Latvia, 2000 to 2023.
Year 1000 No Change
2000 380.78 1000 No
2001 313.77 1000 No -17.6%
2002 333.95 1000 No +6.4%
2003 300.53 1000 No -10.0%
2004 292.85 1000 No -2.6%
2005 278.9 1000 No -4.8%
2006 285.16 1000 No +2.2%
2007 269.48 1000 No -5.5%
2008 230.07 1000 No -14.6%
2009 197.87 1000 No -14.0%
2010 186.15 1000 No -5.9%
2011 190.7 1000 No +2.4%
2012 198.19 1000 No +3.9%
2013 191.97 1000 No -3.1%
2014 192.09 1000 No +0.1%
2015 192.89 1000 No +0.4%
2016 191.62 1000 No -0.7%
2017 179.64 1000 No -6.3%
2018 184.39 1000 No +2.6%
2019 172.12 1000 No -6.7%
2020 168.63 1000 No -2.0%
2021 145.83 1000 No -13.5%
2022 155.05 1000 No +6.3%
2023 156.19 1000 No +0.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 288.34 1000 No 197.87 1000 No 380.78 1000 No 10
2010s 187.98 1000 No 172.12 1000 No 198.19 1000 No 10
2020s 156.43 1000 No 145.83 1000 No 168.63 1000 No 4

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 108 Lithuania 223.12 1000 No compare
  2. 109 Palestine 194.41 1000 No compare
  3. 110 Solomon Islands 179.14 1000 No compare
  4. 112 North Macedonia 139.75 1000 No compare
  5. 113 Slovenia 135.11 1000 No compare
  6. 114 Fiji 133.62 1000 No compare

See the full ranking of 193 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value in Latvia?
Fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value in Latvia was 156.19 1000 No in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 380.78 1000 No in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 145.83 1000 No in 2021.
How does Latvia rank for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value?
Latvia ranks 111th out of 145 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — value rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is down 18.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-value/latvia/">FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,476 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.