FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value in Bhutan

Bhutan: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value was 112.27 1000 No in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
112.27 1000 No
Change on year
up 9.4%
World rank
107th
of 137 countries
All-time high
126.44 1000 No
in 2015
All-time low
102.43 1000 No
in 2000
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value in Bhutan, 2000–2023

0501001502000201120232000: 102.4 1000 No2001: 105.2 1000 No2002: 108.3 1000 No2003: 111.3 1000 No2004: 113.9 1000 No2005: 115.3 1000 No2006: 118 1000 No2007: 119.3 1000 No2008: 121 1000 No2009: 122.4 1000 No2010: 122.3 1000 No2011: 124.8 1000 No2012: 111.1 1000 No2013: 117.2 1000 No2014: 118.4 1000 No2015: 126.4 1000 No2016: 124.7 1000 No2017: 122.4 1000 No2018: 116.2 1000 No2019: 110.8 1000 No2020: 112 1000 No2021: 115.8 1000 No2022: 102.6 1000 No2023: 112.3 1000 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.

Analysis

Bhutan recorded 112.27 1000 No for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.4% on the previous year and down 4.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value in Bhutan peaked at 126.44 1000 No in 2015 and was at its lowest, 102.43 1000 No, in 2000.

Bhutan ranks 107th of 137 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value in Bhutan, 2000 to 2023.
Year 1000 No Change
2000 102.43 1000 No
2001 105.25 1000 No +2.8%
2002 108.29 1000 No +2.9%
2003 111.3 1000 No +2.8%
2004 113.88 1000 No +2.3%
2005 115.35 1000 No +1.3%
2006 118.01 1000 No +2.3%
2007 119.26 1000 No +1.1%
2008 120.96 1000 No +1.4%
2009 122.37 1000 No +1.2%
2010 122.29 1000 No -0.1%
2011 124.79 1000 No +2.0%
2012 111.14 1000 No -10.9%
2013 117.15 1000 No +5.4%
2014 118.41 1000 No +1.1%
2015 126.44 1000 No +6.8%
2016 124.65 1000 No -1.4%
2017 122.39 1000 No -1.8%
2018 116.25 1000 No -5.0%
2019 110.8 1000 No -4.7%
2020 111.96 1000 No +1.0%
2021 115.82 1000 No +3.4%
2022 102.61 1000 No -11.4%
2023 112.27 1000 No +9.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 113.71 1000 No 102.43 1000 No 122.37 1000 No 10
2010s 119.43 1000 No 110.8 1000 No 126.44 1000 No 10
2020s 110.66 1000 No 102.61 1000 No 115.82 1000 No 4

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 104 Singapore 136.94 1000 No compare
  2. 105 Lithuania 121.57 1000 No compare
  3. 106 Gambia 121.14 1000 No compare
  4. 108 Latvia 92.02 1000 No compare
  5. 109 Solomon Islands 90.31 1000 No compare
  6. 110 Fiji 89.45 1000 No compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value in Bhutan?
Fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value in Bhutan was 112.27 1000 No in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 126.44 1000 No in 2015.
What is the lowest fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 102.43 1000 No in 2000.
How does Bhutan rank for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value?
Bhutan ranks 107th out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — male — value rising or falling in Bhutan?
Over the last ten years it is down 4.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value in Bhutan. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-male-value/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-male-value/bhutan/">FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.