FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female in Belarus

Belarus: FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female was 455.51 1000 No in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
455.51 1000 No
Change on year
down 1.3%
World rank
59th
of 137 countries
All-time high
580.79 1000 No
in 2000
All-time low
419.35 1000 No
in 2015
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female in Belarus, 2000–2023

02004006002000201120232000: 580.8 1000 No2001: 579 1000 No2002: 568.3 1000 No2003: 559.3 1000 No2004: 544.8 1000 No2005: 537.6 1000 No2006: 526.7 1000 No2007: 517.2 1000 No2008: 503 1000 No2009: 497 1000 No2010: 484 1000 No2011: 467.6 1000 No2012: 459.3 1000 No2013: 450.9 1000 No2014: 441.4 1000 No2015: 419.4 1000 No2016: 470.2 1000 No2017: 490.4 1000 No2018: 475.5 1000 No2019: 467.9 1000 No2020: 462.6 1000 No2021: 474.6 1000 No2022: 461.7 1000 No2023: 455.5 1000 No

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female in Belarus stood at 455.51 1000 No.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.3% on the previous year and up 1.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female in Belarus peaked at 580.79 1000 No in 2000 and was at its lowest, 419.35 1000 No, in 2015.

That places Belarus 59th out of 137 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female — Value in Belarus, 2000 to 2023.
Year 1000 No Change
2000 580.79 1000 No
2001 579.04 1000 No -0.3%
2002 568.34 1000 No -1.8%
2003 559.28 1000 No -1.6%
2004 544.77 1000 No -2.6%
2005 537.61 1000 No -1.3%
2006 526.72 1000 No -2.0%
2007 517.18 1000 No -1.8%
2008 503.04 1000 No -2.7%
2009 496.97 1000 No -1.2%
2010 483.97 1000 No -2.6%
2011 467.61 1000 No -3.4%
2012 459.32 1000 No -1.8%
2013 450.88 1000 No -1.8%
2014 441.42 1000 No -2.1%
2015 419.35 1000 No -5.0%
2016 470.16 1000 No +12.1%
2017 490.4 1000 No +4.3%
2018 475.48 1000 No -3.0%
2019 467.88 1000 No -1.6%
2020 462.63 1000 No -1.1%
2021 474.63 1000 No +2.6%
2022 461.69 1000 No -2.7%
2023 455.51 1000 No -1.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 541.37 1000 No 496.97 1000 No 580.79 1000 No 10
2010s 462.65 1000 No 419.35 1000 No 490.4 1000 No 10
2020s 463.62 1000 No 455.51 1000 No 474.63 1000 No 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 56 Honduras 515.64 1000 No compare
  2. 57 El Salvador 484.46 1000 No compare
  3. 58 Serbia 471.14 1000 No compare
  4. 60 Greece 451.38 1000 No compare
  5. 61 Tajikistan 446.96 1000 No compare
  6. 62 Eritrea 438.67 1000 No compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female in Belarus?
Fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female in Belarus was 455.51 1000 No in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 580.79 1000 No in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 419.35 1000 No in 2015.
How does Belarus rank for fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female?
Belarus ranks 59th out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — total employment in agrifood systems (afs) — female rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-female-value/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-total-employment-in-agrifood-systems-afs-female-value/belarus/">FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Total employment in agrifood systems (AFS) — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,376 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.