FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Philippines

Philippines: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total was 14.95 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
14.95 %
Change on year
up 2.5%
World rank
23rd
of 125 countries
All-time high
18.94 %
in 2011
All-time low
14.59 %
in 2022
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Philippines, 2000–2023

051015202000201120232000: 16.1 %2001: 16.2 %2002: 16.5 %2003: 16.6 %2004: 16.9 %2005: 16.9 %2006: 17.2 %2007: 17.3 %2008: 17.8 %2009: 18.4 %2010: 18.4 %2011: 18.9 %2012: 16.9 %2013: 17.1 %2014: 16.8 %2015: 16.6 %2016: 15.9 %2017: 16.3 %2018: 15.7 %2019: 15.6 %2020: 15.2 %2021: 14.7 %2022: 14.6 %2023: 14.9 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Philippines is 14.95 %, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of up 2.5% on the previous year and down 12.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Philippines peaked at 18.94 % in 2011 and was at its lowest, 14.59 %, in 2022.

That places Philippines 23rd out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Philippines, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value in Philippines, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 16.08 %
2001 16.16 % +0.5%
2002 16.52 % +2.2%
2003 16.6 % +0.5%
2004 16.91 % +1.9%
2005 16.9 % -0.1%
2006 17.16 % +1.5%
2007 17.34 % +1.0%
2008 17.83 % +2.8%
2009 18.35 % +2.9%
2010 18.42 % +0.4%
2011 18.94 % +2.8%
2012 16.95 % -10.5%
2013 17.05 % +0.6%
2014 16.84 % -1.2%
2015 16.59 % -1.5%
2016 15.9 % -4.2%
2017 16.31 % +2.6%
2018 15.66 % -4.0%
2019 15.63 % -0.2%
2020 15.23 % -2.6%
2021 14.71 % -3.4%
2022 14.59 % -0.8%
2023 14.95 % +2.5%

Philippines compared with similar countries

  • Philippines's 14.95 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 13.19 %, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Philippines's 14.95 % is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 13.82 %, 1.1× the median. (14 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 16.98 % 16.08 % 18.35 % 10
2010s 16.83 % 15.63 % 18.94 % 10
2020s 14.87 % 14.59 % 15.23 % 4

Countries ranked near Philippines

  1. 20 Egypt 15.33 % compare
  2. 21 Kyrgyzstan 15.31 % compare
  3. 22 Papua New Guinea 15.19 % compare
  4. 24 El Salvador 14.91 % compare
  5. 25 Colombia 14.85 % compare
  6. 25 Sudan 14.85 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Philippines

All data for Philippines →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Philippines?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Philippines was 14.95 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total recorded in Philippines?
The highest recorded value was 18.94 % in 2011.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total recorded in Philippines?
The lowest recorded value was 14.59 % in 2022.
How does Philippines rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
Philippines ranks 23rd out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total rising or falling in Philippines?
Over the last ten years it is down 12.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Philippines data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Philippines. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/philippines/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Philippines</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.