FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Bhutan

Bhutan: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total was 9.75 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
9.75 %
Change on year
up 26.8%
World rank
75th
of 125 countries
All-time high
10.3 %
in 2012
All-time low
7.56 %
in 2019
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Bhutan, 2000–2023

02.557.5102000201120232000: 7.7 %2001: 7.7 %2002: 8 %2003: 8.1 %2004: 8.4 %2005: 8.6 %2006: 8.8 %2007: 9 %2008: 9.2 %2009: 9.4 %2010: 9.6 %2011: 10.2 %2012: 10.3 %2013: 9.3 %2014: 9.4 %2015: 10 %2016: 10.1 %2017: 9.9 %2018: 8.2 %2019: 7.6 %2020: 7.8 %2021: 8 %2022: 7.7 %2023: 9.8 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Bhutan is 9.75 %, measured in 2023.

The figure is up 26.8% on the previous year and up 4.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Bhutan peaked at 10.3 % in 2012 and was at its lowest, 7.56 %, in 2019.

Bhutan ranks 75th of 125 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value in Bhutan, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 7.68 %
2001 7.73 % +0.7%
2002 7.99 % +3.4%
2003 8.09 % +1.3%
2004 8.37 % +3.5%
2005 8.62 % +3.0%
2006 8.83 % +2.4%
2007 9.04 % +2.4%
2008 9.16 % +1.3%
2009 9.36 % +2.2%
2010 9.56 % +2.1%
2011 10.19 % +6.6%
2012 10.3 % +1.1%
2013 9.31 % -9.6%
2014 9.44 % +1.4%
2015 9.97 % +5.6%
2016 10.08 % +1.1%
2017 9.88 % -2.0%
2018 8.23 % -16.7%
2019 7.56 % -8.1%
2020 7.85 % +3.8%
2021 7.95 % +1.3%
2022 7.69 % -3.3%
2023 9.75 % +26.8%

Bhutan compared with similar countries

  • Bhutan's 9.75 % is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 13.08 %, 75% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Bhutan's 9.75 % is below the median for South Asia, which is 14.19 %, 69% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Bhutan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2023 +26.8% 7.69 % 9.75 %

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.49 % 7.68 % 9.36 % 10
2010s 9.45 % 7.56 % 10.3 % 10
2020s 8.31 % 7.69 % 9.75 % 4

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 72 Malta 9.97 % compare
  2. 73 Angola 9.88 % compare
  3. 74 Mongolia 9.83 % compare
  4. 76 Cyprus 9.5 % compare
  5. 77 Guinea-Bissau 9.42 % compare
  6. 78 Burundi 9.32 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Bhutan?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total in Bhutan was 9.75 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 10.3 % in 2012.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 7.56 % in 2019.
How does Bhutan rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total?
Bhutan ranks 75th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total rising or falling in Bhutan?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Bhutan. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-employment-male-value/bhutan/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.