FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 19.88 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
19.88 %
Change on year
down 2.5%
World rank
105th
of 125 countries
All-time high
20.38 %
in 2022
All-time low
11.85 %
in 2008
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Zimbabwe, 2000–2023

051015202000201120232000: 14.3 %2001: 14.2 %2002: 13.7 %2003: 13 %2004: 13.1 %2005: 12.6 %2006: 12.4 %2007: 12.3 %2008: 11.8 %2009: 12.7 %2010: 13.6 %2011: 15.8 %2012: 15.5 %2013: 15 %2014: 14.6 %2015: 14.5 %2016: 14.3 %2017: 14.3 %2018: 14.2 %2019: 14.1 %2020: 16.9 %2021: 19.8 %2022: 20.4 %2023: 19.9 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Zimbabwe is 19.88 %, measured in 2023.

The figure is down 2.5% on the previous year and up 32.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Zimbabwe peaked at 20.38 % in 2022 and was at its lowest, 11.85 %, in 2008.

That places Zimbabwe 105th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value in Zimbabwe, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 14.29 %
2001 14.18 % -0.8%
2002 13.73 % -3.2%
2003 13.02 % -5.2%
2004 13.14 % +0.9%
2005 12.57 % -4.3%
2006 12.44 % -1.0%
2007 12.32 % -1.0%
2008 11.85 % -3.8%
2009 12.67 % +6.9%
2010 13.61 % +7.4%
2011 15.77 % +15.9%
2012 15.49 % -1.8%
2013 15.01 % -3.1%
2014 14.6 % -2.7%
2015 14.5 % -0.7%
2016 14.33 % -1.2%
2017 14.29 % -0.3%
2018 14.22 % -0.5%
2019 14.06 % -1.1%
2020 16.93 % +20.4%
2021 19.8 % +17.0%
2022 20.38 % +2.9%
2023 19.88 % -2.5%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 19.88 % is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 29.77 %, 67% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 19.88 % is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 20.72 %, 96% of the median. (34 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 13.02 % 11.85 % 14.29 % 10
2010s 14.59 % 13.61 % 15.77 % 10
2020s 19.25 % 16.93 % 20.38 % 4

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 102 Benin 21.07 % compare
  2. 103 Bhutan 20.78 % compare
  3. 104 Zambia 20.37 % compare
  4. 106 Comoros 18.91 % compare
  5. 107 Mali 18.19 % compare
  6. 108 Angola 16.94 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Zimbabwe?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Zimbabwe was 19.88 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 20.38 % in 2022.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 11.85 % in 2008.
How does Zimbabwe rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Zimbabwe ranks 105th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is up 32.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Zimbabwe. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/zimbabwe/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.