FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South America

South America: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 69.91 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
69.91 %
Change on year
up 2.0%
Rank
11th
of 31 groups
All-time high
70.03 %
in 2019
All-time low
61.6 %
in 2002
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South America, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 65.2 %2001: 62.7 %2002: 61.6 %2003: 62.7 %2004: 63 %2005: 63.3 %2006: 64.2 %2007: 65.1 %2008: 66.8 %2009: 67.3 %2010: 68.5 %2011: 68.5 %2012: 68 %2013: 68.2 %2014: 69.1 %2015: 69 %2016: 68.8 %2017: 69.8 %2018: 69.8 %2019: 70 %2020: 65.8 %2021: 66.5 %2022: 68.6 %2023: 69.9 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in South America is 69.91 %, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.0% on the previous year and up 2.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in South America peaked at 70.03 % in 2019 and was at its lowest, 61.6 %, in 2002.

South America ranks 11th of 31 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South America, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in South America, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 65.19 %
2001 62.73 % -3.8%
2002 61.6 % -1.8%
2003 62.66 % +1.7%
2004 63.04 % +0.6%
2005 63.26 % +0.3%
2006 64.17 % +1.4%
2007 65.13 % +1.5%
2008 66.81 % +2.6%
2009 67.33 % +0.8%
2010 68.51 % +1.8%
2011 68.53 % +0.0%
2012 68.03 % -0.7%
2013 68.17 % +0.2%
2014 69.13 % +1.4%
2015 68.99 % -0.2%
2016 68.75 % -0.3%
2017 69.76 % +1.5%
2018 69.77 % +0.0%
2019 70.03 % +0.4%
2020 65.81 % -6.0%
2021 66.54 % +1.1%
2022 68.57 % +3.1%
2023 69.91 % +2.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 64.19 % 61.6 % 67.33 % 10
2010s 68.97 % 68.03 % 70.03 % 10
2020s 67.71 % 65.81 % 69.91 % 4

Countries ranked near South America

  1. 8 Cyprus 91.02 % compare
  2. 8 Melanesia 37.23 % compare
  3. 9 Belgium 89.65 % compare
  4. 10 Estonia 89.2 % compare
  5. 10 Timor-Leste 28.69 % compare
  6. 11 Seychelles 88.52 % compare
  7. 11 United Republic of Tanzania 20.64 % compare
  8. 12 El Salvador 88.51 % compare
  9. 13 Cabo Verde 65.09 % compare
  10. 13 Lao People's Democratic Republic 18.02 % compare
  11. 13 Spain 87.85 % compare
  12. 14 Germany 87.45 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for South America

All data for South America →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in South America?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in South America was 69.91 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in South America?
The highest recorded value was 70.03 % in 2019.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in South America?
The lowest recorded value was 61.6 % in 2002.
How does South America rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
South America ranks 11th out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in South America?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South America data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South America. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/south-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/south-america/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in South America</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.