FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Belarus

Belarus: FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS was 64.97 % in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
64.97 %
Change on year
up 0.7%
World rank
59th
of 125 countries
All-time high
65.59 %
in 2016
All-time low
47.04 %
in 2000
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Belarus, 2000–2023

02040602000201120232000: 47 %2001: 47.8 %2002: 48.2 %2003: 49.2 %2004: 50.5 %2005: 52.4 %2006: 54 %2007: 55.5 %2008: 56.9 %2009: 57.2 %2010: 58.4 %2011: 58.9 %2012: 59.7 %2013: 60.2 %2014: 60.9 %2015: 61 %2016: 65.6 %2017: 64.2 %2018: 61.2 %2019: 61.3 %2020: 62.3 %2021: 61.5 %2022: 64.5 %2023: 65 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Belarus stood at 64.97 %.

The figure is up 0.7% on the previous year and up 8.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Belarus peaked at 65.59 % in 2016 and was at its lowest, 47.04 %, in 2000.

Belarus ranks 59th of 125 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value in Belarus, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 47.04 %
2001 47.77 % +1.6%
2002 48.19 % +0.9%
2003 49.19 % +2.1%
2004 50.51 % +2.7%
2005 52.42 % +3.8%
2006 54.04 % +3.1%
2007 55.55 % +2.8%
2008 56.87 % +2.4%
2009 57.18 % +0.5%
2010 58.44 % +2.2%
2011 58.91 % +0.8%
2012 59.67 % +1.3%
2013 60.16 % +0.8%
2014 60.93 % +1.3%
2015 61.03 % +0.2%
2016 65.59 % +7.5%
2017 64.19 % -2.1%
2018 61.18 % -4.7%
2019 61.34 % +0.3%
2020 62.29 % +1.5%
2021 61.54 % -1.2%
2022 64.49 % +4.8%
2023 64.97 % +0.7%

Belarus compared with similar countries

  • Belarus's 64.97 % is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 59.2 %, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Belarus's 64.97 % is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 78.71 %, 83% of the median. (38 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 51.88 % 47.04 % 57.18 % 10
2010s 61.14 % 58.44 % 65.59 % 10
2020s 63.32 % 61.54 % 64.97 % 4

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 56 Nigeria 66.47 % compare
  2. 57 Panama 65.95 % compare
  3. 58 Jamaica 65.08 % compare
  4. 60 Eswatini 64.6 % compare
  5. 61 North Macedonia 64.29 % compare
  6. 62 Romania 62.03 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Belarus?
Fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs in Belarus was 64.97 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 65.59 % in 2016.
What is the lowest fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 47.04 % in 2000.
How does Belarus rank for fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs?
Belarus ranks 59th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of non-agricultural afs employment in total afs rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-non-agricultural-afs-employment-in-total-afs-employment-female-value/belarus/">FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of non-agricultural AFS employment in total AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.