FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment in Liberia

Liberia: FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment was 69.73 % in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
69.73 %
Change on year
up 6.0%
World rank
7th
of 125 countries
All-time high
69.73 %
in 2023
All-time low
62.31 %
in 2017
Years of data
23
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment in Liberia, 2000–2023

02040602000201120232000: 66.6 %2001: 66.7 %2002: 65.9 %2003: 65.2 %2004: 64.3 %2005: 65 %2006: 64.8 %2007: 65.2 %2008: 64.6 %2009: 64.1 %2010: 67.3 %2011: 66.8 %2012: 66.1 %2013: 65.3 %2014: 64.7 %2015: 64.2 %2016: 63.8 %2017: 62.3 %2019: 65.8 %2020: 65.5 %2021: 65.5 %2022: 65.8 %2023: 69.7 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2023, fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment in Liberia stood at 69.73 %. That is the highest value across all 23 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.0% on the previous year and up 6.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment in Liberia peaked at 69.73 % in 2023 and was at its lowest, 62.31 %, in 2017.

That places Liberia 7th out of 125 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment in Liberia, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value in Liberia, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 66.61 %
2001 66.68 % +0.1%
2002 65.86 % -1.2%
2003 65.22 % -1.0%
2004 64.35 % -1.3%
2005 64.96 % +0.9%
2006 64.8 % -0.2%
2007 65.19 % +0.6%
2008 64.63 % -0.9%
2009 64.11 % -0.8%
2010 67.29 % +5.0%
2011 66.82 % -0.7%
2012 66.12 % -1.0%
2013 65.33 % -1.2%
2014 64.72 % -0.9%
2015 64.15 % -0.9%
2016 63.83 % -0.5%
2017 62.31 % -2.4%
2019 65.77 % +5.6%
2020 65.46 % -0.5%
2021 65.46 % +0.0%
2022 65.79 % +0.5%
2023 69.73 % +6.0%

Liberia compared with similar countries

  • Liberia's 69.73 % is above the median for low income countries, which is 59.03 %, 1.2× the median. (16 countries reporting)
  • Liberia's 69.73 % is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 55.58 %, 1.3× the median. (34 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 65.24 % 64.11 % 66.68 % 10
2010s 65.15 % 62.31 % 67.29 % 9
2020s 66.61 % 65.46 % 69.73 % 4

Countries ranked near Liberia

  1. 4 Côte d'Ivoire 62.3 % compare
  2. 4 Lao People's Democratic Republic 62.01 % compare
  3. 4 Sierra Leone 73.81 % compare
  4. 5 Timor-Leste 61.71 % compare
  5. 5 Togo 71.52 % compare
  6. 6 Ghana 69.85 % compare
  7. 6 Viet Nam 61.18 % compare
  8. 7 Micronesia 60.1 % compare
  9. 8 Nigeria 68.86 % compare
  10. 9 Angola 68.2 % compare
  11. 9 Cabo Verde 53.74 % compare
  12. 10 Gambia 67.85 % compare
  13. 10 United Republic of Tanzania 52.2 % compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Liberia

All data for Liberia →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment in Liberia?
Fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment in Liberia was 69.73 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment recorded in Liberia?
The highest recorded value was 69.73 % in 2023.
What is the lowest fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment recorded in Liberia?
The lowest recorded value was 62.31 % in 2017.
How does Liberia rank for fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment?
Liberia ranks 7th out of 125 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of females in non-agricultural afs employment rising or falling in Liberia?
Over the last ten years it is up 6.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Liberia data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment in Liberia. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-females-in-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-females-in-non-agricultural-afs-employment-female-value/liberia/">FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment in Liberia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of females in non-agricultural AFS employment — Female — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
171 places, 3,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.