FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 84.08 % in 2023. ▬ Flat
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2000–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 2023, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) stood at 84.08 %.
That represents a change of up 1.6% on the previous year and up 0.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 86.49 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 82.23 %, in 2019.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st of 31 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 86.49 % | — |
| 2001 | 86.36 % | -0.2% |
| 2002 | 86.26 % | -0.1% |
| 2003 | 86.15 % | -0.1% |
| 2004 | 85.94 % | -0.2% |
| 2005 | 84.31 % | -1.9% |
| 2006 | 85.18 % | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 84.88 % | -0.4% |
| 2008 | 84.7 % | -0.2% |
| 2009 | 84.51 % | -0.2% |
| 2010 | 84.48 % | -0.0% |
| 2011 | 84.5 % | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 83.29 % | -1.4% |
| 2013 | 83.57 % | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 83.4 % | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 83.34 % | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 83.04 % | -0.4% |
| 2017 | 82.58 % | -0.6% |
| 2018 | 82.44 % | -0.2% |
| 2019 | 82.23 % | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 82.64 % | +0.5% |
| 2021 | 82.8 % | +0.2% |
| 2022 | 82.76 % | -0.0% |
| 2023 | 84.08 % | +1.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.48 % | 84.31 % | 86.49 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 83.29 % | 82.23 % | 84.5 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 83.07 % | 82.64 % | 84.08 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- 1 Cuba 100 % compare
- 1 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 100 % compare
- 1 Eritrea 100 % compare
- 1 Fiji 100 % compare
- 1 French Polynesia 100 % compare
- 1 Guam 100 % compare
- 1 Guyana 100 % compare
- 1 Lebanon 100 % compare
- 1 Maldives 100 % compare
- 1 Nepal 100 % compare
- 1 New Caledonia 100 % compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 100 % compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 100 % compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 % compare
- 1 Samoa 100 % compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Tajikistan 100 % compare
- 1 United States Virgin Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Yemen 100 % compare
- 3 Democratic Republic of the Congo 92.15 % compare
- 4 Lao People's Democratic Republic 85.8 % compare
- 4 Caribbean 76.84 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate 0.8325 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Milk Animals, annual growth rate 1.22 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3055 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate 0.9219 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production, annual growth rate 1.24 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.2261 % change on previous year (2024)
- Poultry Birds — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 4.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.9081 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.02 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 84.08 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 86.49 % in 2000.
- What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 82.23 % in 2019.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 1st out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
- Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 0.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.