FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh

Bangladesh: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 71.09 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
71.09 %
Change on year
down 0.4%
World rank
47th
of 145 countries
All-time high
76.58 %
in 2000
All-time low
67.08 %
in 2017
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 76.6 %2001: 76.3 %2002: 76.1 %2003: 75.7 %2004: 75.4 %2005: 74.7 %2006: 69.2 %2007: 69.5 %2008: 69.9 %2009: 70.2 %2010: 70.9 %2011: 69.9 %2012: 69 %2013: 68.1 %2014: 67.8 %2015: 67.5 %2016: 67.2 %2017: 67.1 %2018: 67.8 %2019: 68.4 %2020: 69.4 %2021: 70.5 %2022: 71.3 %2023: 71.1 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh is 71.09 %, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of down 0.4% on the previous year and up 4.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh peaked at 76.58 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 67.08 %, in 2017.

That places Bangladesh 47th out of 145 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Value in Bangladesh, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 76.58 %
2001 76.34 % -0.3%
2002 76.06 % -0.4%
2003 75.69 % -0.5%
2004 75.36 % -0.4%
2005 74.71 % -0.9%
2006 69.21 % -7.4%
2007 69.55 % +0.5%
2008 69.88 % +0.5%
2009 70.21 % +0.5%
2010 70.87 % +0.9%
2011 69.94 % -1.3%
2012 69.03 % -1.3%
2013 68.13 % -1.3%
2014 67.83 % -0.4%
2015 67.48 % -0.5%
2016 67.15 % -0.5%
2017 67.08 % -0.1%
2018 67.78 % +1.0%
2019 68.4 % +0.9%
2020 69.4 % +1.5%
2021 70.49 % +1.6%
2022 71.34 % +1.2%
2023 71.09 % -0.4%

Bangladesh compared with similar countries

  • Bangladesh's 71.09 % is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 66.23 %, 1.1× the median. (33 countries reporting)
  • Bangladesh's 71.09 % is below the median for South Asia, which is 75.14 %, 95% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 73.36 % 69.21 % 76.58 % 10
2010s 68.37 % 67.08 % 70.87 % 10
2020s 70.58 % 69.4 % 71.34 % 4

Countries ranked near Bangladesh

  1. 44 Sudan 73.27 % compare
  2. 45 Kenya 72.89 % compare
  3. 46 Myanmar 72.71 % compare
  4. 48 Mongolia 70.6 % compare
  5. 49 Sierra Leone 68.69 % compare
  6. 50 Liberia 68.5 % compare

See the full ranking of 193 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Bangladesh

All data for Bangladesh →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh?
Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh was 71.09 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Bangladesh?
The highest recorded value was 76.58 % in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Bangladesh?
The lowest recorded value was 67.08 % in 2017.
How does Bangladesh rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Bangladesh ranks 47th out of 145 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Bangladesh?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-value/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-value/bangladesh/">FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 4,451 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.