FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Iceland

Iceland: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 32.58 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
32.58 %
Change on year
down 10.1%
World rank
111th
of 137 countries
All-time high
44.58 %
in 2003
All-time low
32.58 %
in 2023
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Iceland, 2000–2023

0102030402000201120232000: 43.4 %2001: 43.8 %2002: 41.5 %2003: 44.6 %2004: 43.9 %2005: 39.8 %2006: 39.7 %2007: 43.5 %2008: 40.3 %2009: 40 %2010: 42.9 %2011: 42.2 %2012: 42.2 %2013: 33.8 %2014: 36.8 %2015: 36.3 %2016: 32.7 %2017: 32.9 %2018: 39 %2019: 37.8 %2020: 36 %2021: 34.5 %2022: 36.3 %2023: 32.6 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

Iceland recorded 32.58 % for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.

The figure is down 10.1% on the previous year and down 3.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Iceland peaked at 44.58 % in 2003 and was at its lowest, 32.58 %, in 2023.

That places Iceland 111th out of 137 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Iceland, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value in Iceland, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 43.41 %
2001 43.84 % +1.0%
2002 41.5 % -5.3%
2003 44.58 % +7.4%
2004 43.9 % -1.5%
2005 39.79 % -9.4%
2006 39.68 % -0.3%
2007 43.52 % +9.7%
2008 40.29 % -7.4%
2009 40.03 % -0.6%
2010 42.92 % +7.2%
2011 42.16 % -1.8%
2012 42.25 % +0.2%
2013 33.81 % -20.0%
2014 36.79 % +8.8%
2015 36.27 % -1.4%
2016 32.73 % -9.8%
2017 32.85 % +0.4%
2018 38.99 % +18.7%
2019 37.84 % -2.9%
2020 35.99 % -4.9%
2021 34.46 % -4.3%
2022 36.26 % +5.2%
2023 32.58 % -10.1%

Iceland compared with similar countries

  • Iceland's 32.58 % is below the median for high income countries, which is 33.23 %, 98% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
  • Iceland's 32.58 % is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 38.54 %, 85% of the median. (38 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 42.05 % 39.68 % 44.58 % 10
2010s 37.66 % 32.73 % 42.92 % 10
2020s 34.82 % 32.58 % 36.26 % 4

Countries ranked near Iceland

  1. 108 Palestine, State of 34.52 % compare
  2. 109 Slovenia 33.44 % compare
  3. 110 Croatia 33.02 % compare
  4. 112 Czechia 32.11 % compare
  5. 113 Estonia 31.1 % compare
  6. 114 Jordan 30.08 % compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Iceland

All data for Iceland →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Iceland?
Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Iceland was 32.58 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Iceland?
The highest recorded value was 44.58 % in 2003.
What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Iceland?
The lowest recorded value was 32.58 % in 2023.
How does Iceland rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Iceland ranks 111th out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Iceland?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Iceland data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Iceland. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/iceland/">FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Iceland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.