FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bhutan

Bhutan: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 79.22 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
79.22 %
Change on year
down 4.3%
World rank
40th
of 137 countries
All-time high
88.63 %
in 2000
All-time low
79.22 %
in 2023
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bhutan, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 88.6 %2001: 88.5 %2002: 88.1 %2003: 87.8 %2004: 87.4 %2005: 87 %2006: 86.6 %2007: 86.3 %2008: 86 %2009: 85.6 %2010: 85.2 %2011: 84.2 %2012: 83.3 %2013: 84.2 %2014: 84.2 %2015: 84 %2016: 83.5 %2017: 83.3 %2018: 85.2 %2019: 85.1 %2020: 84.6 %2021: 84.2 %2022: 82.8 %2023: 79.2 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bhutan is 79.22 %, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.3% on the previous year and down 5.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bhutan peaked at 88.63 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 79.22 %, in 2023.

That places Bhutan 40th out of 137 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value in Bhutan, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 88.63 %
2001 88.48 % -0.2%
2002 88.07 % -0.5%
2003 87.85 % -0.2%
2004 87.4 % -0.5%
2005 86.97 % -0.5%
2006 86.63 % -0.4%
2007 86.26 % -0.4%
2008 86.02 % -0.3%
2009 85.62 % -0.5%
2010 85.18 % -0.5%
2011 84.22 % -1.1%
2012 83.31 % -1.1%
2013 84.22 % +1.1%
2014 84.16 % -0.1%
2015 84.05 % -0.1%
2016 83.46 % -0.7%
2017 83.34 % -0.1%
2018 85.19 % +2.2%
2019 85.07 % -0.1%
2020 84.56 % -0.6%
2021 84.23 % -0.4%
2022 82.8 % -1.7%
2023 79.22 % -4.3%

Bhutan compared with similar countries

  • Bhutan's 79.22 % is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 72.69 %, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Bhutan's 79.22 % is above the median for South Asia, which is 74.63 %, 1.1× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 87.19 % 85.62 % 88.63 % 10
2010s 84.22 % 83.31 % 85.19 % 10
2020s 82.7 % 79.22 % 84.56 % 4

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 37 Comoros 81.09 % compare
  2. 38 Zimbabwe 80.12 % compare
  3. 39 Zambia 79.63 % compare
  4. 41 Benin 78.93 % compare
  5. 42 Myanmar 77.69 % compare
  6. 43 Afghanistan 77.38 % compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bhutan?
Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bhutan was 79.22 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 88.63 % in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 79.22 % in 2023.
How does Bhutan rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Bhutan ranks 40th out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Bhutan?
Over the last ten years it is down 5.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bhutan. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/bhutan/">FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.