FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh

Bangladesh: FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment was 52.6 % in 2023. ▼ Falling

Latest (2023)
52.6 %
Change on year
down 1.0%
World rank
82nd
of 137 countries
All-time high
72.76 %
in 2000
All-time low
52.6 %
in 2023
Years of data
24
2000–2023

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh, 2000–2023

0204060802000201120232000: 72.8 %2001: 72.5 %2002: 72 %2003: 71.7 %2004: 71.2 %2005: 70.7 %2006: 64.4 %2007: 64.2 %2008: 64.3 %2009: 64.4 %2010: 65 %2011: 64.4 %2012: 64.2 %2013: 63.9 %2014: 62.1 %2015: 60.1 %2016: 58.1 %2017: 56.5 %2018: 55.7 %2019: 54.7 %2020: 54.5 %2021: 54 %2022: 53.1 %2023: 52.6 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

The most recent figure for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh is 52.6 %, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.

That represents a change of down 1.0% on the previous year and down 17.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh peaked at 72.76 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 52.6 %, in 2023.

That places Bangladesh 82nd out of 137 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh, year by year

Annual values for FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value in Bangladesh, 2000 to 2023.
Year % Change
2000 72.76 %
2001 72.51 % -0.3%
2002 72.05 % -0.6%
2003 71.71 % -0.5%
2004 71.18 % -0.7%
2005 70.65 % -0.7%
2006 64.36 % -8.9%
2007 64.24 % -0.2%
2008 64.32 % +0.1%
2009 64.38 % +0.1%
2010 65.01 % +1.0%
2011 64.41 % -0.9%
2012 64.17 % -0.4%
2013 63.93 % -0.4%
2014 62.1 % -2.9%
2015 60.15 % -3.1%
2016 58.1 % -3.4%
2017 56.55 % -2.7%
2018 55.69 % -1.5%
2019 54.73 % -1.7%
2020 54.49 % -0.4%
2021 54 % -0.9%
2022 53.14 % -1.6%
2023 52.6 % -1.0%

Bangladesh compared with similar countries

  • Bangladesh's 52.6 % is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 72.69 %, 72% of the median. (32 countries reporting)
  • Bangladesh's 52.6 % is below the median for South Asia, which is 74.63 %, 70% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 68.82 % 64.24 % 72.76 % 10
2010s 60.48 % 54.73 % 65.01 % 10
2020s 53.56 % 52.6 % 54.49 % 4

Countries ranked near Bangladesh

  1. 79 Colombia 55.11 % compare
  2. 80 Gambia 54.05 % compare
  3. 81 Egypt 53.58 % compare
  4. 83 Mexico 52.35 % compare
  5. 84 Belarus 52.07 % compare
  6. 85 Poland 50 % compare

See the full ranking of 185 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Bangladesh

All data for Bangladesh →

Frequently asked questions

What is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh?
Fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment in Bangladesh was 52.6 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Bangladesh?
The highest recorded value was 72.76 % in 2000.
What is the lowest fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment recorded in Bangladesh?
The lowest recorded value was 52.6 % in 2023.
How does Bangladesh rank for fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment?
Bangladesh ranks 82nd out of 137 countries with data for 2023.
Is fao model — share of agricultural employment in total afs employment rising or falling in Bangladesh?
Over the last ten years it is down 17.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/fao-model-share-of-agricultural-employment-in-total-afs-employment-male-value/bangladesh/">FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment in Bangladesh</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
FAO Model — Share of agricultural employment in total AFS employment — Male — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
185 places, 4,347 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.