FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs): FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value was 61.73 % in 2023. ▼ Falling
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), 2000–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) recorded 61.73 % for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) peaked at 69.6 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 61.36 %, in 2019.
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 8th of 31 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 69.6 % | — |
| 2001 | 68.86 % | -1.1% |
| 2002 | 67.94 % | -1.3% |
| 2003 | 67.37 % | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 67.29 % | -0.1% |
| 2005 | 67.87 % | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 67.67 % | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 66.21 % | -2.2% |
| 2008 | 65.11 % | -1.7% |
| 2009 | 64.84 % | -0.4% |
| 2010 | 64.25 % | -0.9% |
| 2011 | 64.45 % | +0.3% |
| 2012 | 64.59 % | +0.2% |
| 2013 | 65.05 % | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 64.46 % | -0.9% |
| 2015 | 64 % | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 63.53 % | -0.7% |
| 2017 | 63.06 % | -0.7% |
| 2018 | 62.22 % | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 61.36 % | -1.4% |
| 2020 | 62.23 % | +1.4% |
| 2021 | 62.16 % | -0.1% |
| 2022 | 61.76 % | -0.6% |
| 2023 | 61.73 % | -0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.28 % | 64.84 % | 69.6 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 63.7 % | 61.36 % | 65.05 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 61.97 % | 61.73 % | 62.23 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
- 5 Democratic Republic of the Congo 64.6 % compare
- 5 Mali 80.34 % compare
- 6 Guinea-Bissau 77.24 % compare
- 6 Timor-Leste 62.96 % compare
- 7 Uganda 75.82 % compare
- 7 Melanesia 54.81 % compare
- 8 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 54.49 % compare
- 8 Ethiopia 73.55 % compare
- 9 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 49.88 % compare
- 9 Zambia 71.83 % compare
- 10 Viet Nam 43.54 % compare
- 10 Zimbabwe 69.55 % compare
- 11 Nigeria 68.74 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.7463 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sugar Crops Primary — Area harvested, annual growth rate 4.84 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goats — Stocks, annual growth rate 1.89 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth -0.8711 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Production, annual growth rate 0.0366 % change on previous year (2024)
- Sheep and Goat Meat — Yield/Carcass Weight, annual growth rate 7.69 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Production, annual growth rate 2.42 % change on previous year (2024)
- Roots and Tubers, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 1.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate -0.38 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Production, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2024)
All data for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) was 61.73 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value recorded in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 69.6 % in 2000.
- What is the lowest fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value recorded in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 61.36 % in 2019.
- How does Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value?
- Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 8th out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
- Is fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — value rising or falling in Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.