FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value was 60.55 % in 2023. ▼ Falling
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), 2000–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) is 60.55 %, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 24 years on record.
The figure is down 1.2% on the previous year and down 8.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) peaked at 70.2 % in 2006 and was at its lowest, 60.55 %, in 2023.
That places Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) 5th out of 31 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.
FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 69.25 % | — |
| 2001 | 69.01 % | -0.3% |
| 2002 | 68.74 % | -0.4% |
| 2003 | 68.34 % | -0.6% |
| 2004 | 67.84 % | -0.7% |
| 2005 | 68.26 % | +0.6% |
| 2006 | 70.2 % | +2.8% |
| 2007 | 69.58 % | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 68.67 % | -1.3% |
| 2009 | 67.87 % | -1.2% |
| 2010 | 66.45 % | -2.1% |
| 2011 | 65.82 % | -0.9% |
| 2012 | 65.79 % | -0.0% |
| 2013 | 66.06 % | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 67 % | +1.4% |
| 2015 | 66.55 % | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 66.82 % | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 65.92 % | -1.3% |
| 2018 | 65.57 % | -0.5% |
| 2019 | 63.86 % | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 65.9 % | +3.2% |
| 2021 | 63.86 % | -3.1% |
| 2022 | 61.26 % | -4.1% |
| 2023 | 60.55 % | -1.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.78 % | 67.84 % | 70.2 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 65.98 % | 63.86 % | 67 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 62.89 % | 60.55 % | 65.9 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- 2 Chad 81.43 % compare
- 2 Côte d'Ivoire 68.53 % compare
- 2 Lao People's Democratic Republic 77.63 % compare
- 3 Madagascar 81.24 % compare
- 4 Mali 74.9 % compare
- 5 Ethiopia 74.56 % compare
- 5 Timor-Leste 57.96 % compare
- 6 Democratic Republic of the Congo 55.98 % compare
- 6 Mozambique 71.86 % compare
- 7 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 51.21 % compare
- 7 Uganda 69.3 % compare
- 8 Guinea-Bissau 66.99 % compare
- 8 Melanesia 47.75 % compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate 0.8325 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Milk Animals, annual growth rate 1.22 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.3055 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Yield, annual growth rate 0.9219 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Cake Equivalent — Production, annual growth rate 1.24 % change on previous year (2024)
- Oilcrops, Oil Equivalent — Area harvested, annual growth rate 0.2261 % change on previous year (2024)
- Poultry Birds — Stocks, annual growth rate 2.66 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Yield, annual growth rate 4.33 % change on previous year (2024)
- Pulses, Total — Area harvested, annual growth rate -0.9081 % change on previous year (2024)
- Milk, Total — Production, annual growth rate 3.02 % change on previous year (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) was 60.55 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 70.2 % in 2006.
- What is the lowest fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 60.55 % in 2023.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank for fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 5th out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
- Is fao model — share of afs employment in total employment — male — value rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of FAO Model — Share of AFS employment in total employment — Male — Value. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.