Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Mauritania
Mauritania: Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0 t per square kilometre in 1990. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Mauritania, 1961–1990
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 1990, edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Mauritania stood at 0 t per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 30 years on record.
Over the whole period, edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Mauritania peaked at 0 t per square kilometre in 1976 and was at its lowest, 0 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
Mauritania ranks 150th of 150 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Mauritania, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1968 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1970 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1973 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1975 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1976 | 0 t per square kilometre | +817.5% |
| 1977 | 0 t per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1978 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1980 | 0 t per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1981 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1984 | 0 t per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1985 | 0 t per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1986 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1988 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1989 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
Mauritania compared with similar countries
- Mauritania's 0 t per square kilometre is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0055 t per square kilometre. (36 countries reporting)
- Mauritania's 0 t per square kilometre is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.0048 t per square kilometre. (40 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near Mauritania
- 147 Tunisia 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 148 Algeria 0 t per square kilometre compare
- 149 Tajikistan 0 t per square kilometre
More agriculture & rural data for Mauritania
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.81 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1995 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 438.46 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.5156 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3851 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 20.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 20.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Mauritania?
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Mauritania was 0 t per square kilometre in 1990, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Mauritania?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per square kilometre in 1976.
- What is the lowest edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Mauritania?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Mauritania rank for edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Mauritania ranks 150th out of 150 countries with data for 1990.
- Where does this Mauritania data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 30 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of pigs, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.