Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in New Zealand
New Zealand: Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in New Zealand, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in New Zealand stood at 0 t per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
The figure is down 12.2% on the previous year and down 32.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in New Zealand peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1971 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2024.
That places New Zealand 109th out of 145 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in New Zealand, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 1963 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +37.3% |
| 1964 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 1965 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +30.8% |
| 1966 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1967 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 1968 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +7.4% |
| 1969 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
| 1970 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.1% |
| 1971 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +17.3% |
| 1972 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.0% |
| 1973 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +1.9% |
| 1974 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -41.8% |
| 1975 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +25.5% |
| 1976 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +11.7% |
| 1977 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -78.3% |
| 1978 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +32.9% |
| 1979 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +57.7% |
| 1980 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 1981 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 1982 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 1983 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 1984 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +33.6% |
| 1985 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -29.8% |
| 1986 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -70.4% |
| 1987 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +41.6% |
| 1988 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +130.9% |
| 1989 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +145.7% |
| 1990 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -24.0% |
| 1991 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +60.8% |
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -19.9% |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -18.1% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -26.8% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +21.2% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +13.2% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.9% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +23.5% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.1% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -34.4% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.1% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.6% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.7% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +6.2% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +9.2% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +5.2% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +25.9% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -0.3% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +8.7% |
| 2021 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -14.7% |
| 2022 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2023 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -30.8% |
| 2024 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
New Zealand compared with similar countries
- New Zealand's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (45 countries reporting)
- New Zealand's 0 t per US$ of GDP is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 30% of the median. (17 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit in New Zealand changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | +145.7% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
| 1988 | +130.9% | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near New Zealand
More agriculture & rural data for New Zealand
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -10.07 % change on previous year (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2023)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,976 current US$ per person (2023)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.275 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.16 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2023)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in New Zealand?
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit in New Zealand was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1971.
- What is the lowest edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2024.
- How does New Zealand rank for edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit?
- New Zealand ranks 109th out of 145 countries with data for 2024.
- Is edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per unit rising or falling in New Zealand?
- Over the last ten years it is down 32.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of goat, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.