Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Portugal
Portugal: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.1014 t per square kilometre in 2017. ▲ Rising
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Portugal, 1961–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Portugal is 0.1014 t per square kilometre, measured in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.5% on the previous year and down 0.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Portugal peaked at 0.1477 t per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, 0.0507 t per square kilometre, in 1964.
Portugal ranks 59th of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 57 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Portugal, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0515 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0581 t per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0544 t per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0507 t per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0678 t per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1966 | 0.0724 t per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1967 | 0.0608 t per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0693 t per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1969 | 0.0944 t per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 1970 | 0.1047 t per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 1971 | 0.0903 t per square kilometre | -13.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0874 t per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0959 t per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1974 | 0.0996 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1975 | 0.1139 t per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0953 t per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 1977 | 0.0933 t per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1978 | 0.1073 t per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1979 | 0.1098 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1980 | 0.1142 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1981 | 0.1345 t per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1982 | 0.1412 t per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1983 | 0.122 t per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1984 | 0.1106 t per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 1985 | 0.111 t per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 1986 | 0.1168 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1987 | 0.1164 t per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1988 | 0.1275 t per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1989 | 0.1459 t per square kilometre | +14.4% |
| 1990 | 0.1295 t per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1991 | 0.1477 t per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1992 | 0.1417 t per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1993 | 0.134 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1994 | 0.1059 t per square kilometre | -21.0% |
| 1995 | 0.1169 t per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1996 | 0.1116 t per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1997 | 0.1219 t per square kilometre | +9.2% |
| 1998 | 0.1076 t per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1999 | 0.1093 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2000 | 0.1122 t per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 0.1072 t per square kilometre | -4.4% |
| 2002 | 0.1187 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2003 | 0.1177 t per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2004 | 0.1327 t per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2005 | 0.1325 t per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2006 | 0.1181 t per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2007 | 0.1021 t per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.1208 t per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 2009 | 0.1145 t per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.1036 t per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 2011 | 0.1067 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2012 | 0.1034 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0934 t per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0887 t per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0985 t per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2016 | 0.1008 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2017 | 0.1014 t per square kilometre | +0.5% |
Portugal compared with similar countries
- Portugal's 0.1014 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.0504 t per square kilometre, 2.0× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Portugal's 0.1014 t per square kilometre is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.1208 t per square kilometre, 84% of the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0644 t per square kilometre | 0.0507 t per square kilometre | 0.0944 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0997 t per square kilometre | 0.0874 t per square kilometre | 0.1139 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.124 t per square kilometre | 0.1106 t per square kilometre | 0.1459 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1226 t per square kilometre | 0.1059 t per square kilometre | 0.1477 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1176 t per square kilometre | 0.1021 t per square kilometre | 0.1327 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0996 t per square kilometre | 0.0887 t per square kilometre | 0.1067 t per square kilometre | 8 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
More agriculture & rural data for Portugal
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0196 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 628.85 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.5936 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.385 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 2.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 2.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.9% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.4% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Portugal?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Portugal was 0.1014 t per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1477 t per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0507 t per square kilometre in 1964.
- How does Portugal rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Portugal ranks 59th out of 167 countries with data for 2017.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.