Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Mozambique
Mozambique: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per was 0.0044 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Mozambique, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Mozambique recorded 0.0044 t per square kilometre for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in 2023.
That represents a change of up 5.4% on the previous year and up 96.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Mozambique peaked at 0.0076 t per square kilometre in 1981 and was at its lowest, 0.0007 t per square kilometre, in 2002.
Mozambique ranks 155th of 167 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Mozambique, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0051 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0053 t per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0054 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1965 | 0.0057 t per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1966 | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1967 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1968 | 0.0061 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1969 | 0.0062 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1970 | 0.0064 t per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0065 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1972 | 0.0067 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1973 | 0.0068 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1974 | 0.007 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1976 | 0.0065 t per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1977 | 0.007 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1978 | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1979 | 0.0073 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1980 | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1982 | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0073 t per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1984 | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0065 t per square kilometre | -14.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0059 t per square kilometre | -9.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0059 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 1991 | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0031 t per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 1995 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1997 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0028 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2001 | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | -68.6% |
| 2003 | 0.001 t per square kilometre | +39.9% |
| 2004 | 0.0011 t per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2005 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0013 t per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0014 t per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2008 | 0.0016 t per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0019 t per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2010 | 0.0017 t per square kilometre | -13.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0021 t per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0022 t per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2015 | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0032 t per square kilometre | +25.8% |
| 2017 | 0.0032 t per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2019 | 0.0031 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2020 | 0.0031 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2021 | 0.0037 t per square kilometre | +17.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0041 t per square kilometre | +12.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0044 t per square kilometre | +5.4% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per in Mozambique changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | -68.6% | 0.0023 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre |
| 1990 | -47.5% | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | 0.0029 t per square kilometre |
| 2003 | +39.9% | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.001 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0057 t per square kilometre | 0.0051 t per square kilometre | 0.0062 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0069 t per square kilometre | 0.0064 t per square kilometre | 0.0075 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0069 t per square kilometre | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0029 t per square kilometre | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | 0.0031 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0015 t per square kilometre | 0.0007 t per square kilometre | 0.0025 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0026 t per square kilometre | 0.0017 t per square kilometre | 0.0032 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0038 t per square kilometre | 0.0031 t per square kilometre | 0.0044 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mozambique
- 152 Mauritania 0.0059 t per square kilometre compare
- 153 Namibia 0.0056 t per square kilometre compare
- 154 Canada 0.0049 t per square kilometre compare
- 156 Saudi Arabia 0.0039 t per square kilometre compare
- 157 Solomon Islands 0.0034 t per square kilometre compare
- 158 Seychelles 0.0028 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Mozambique
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.2557 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2557 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 160.3 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.63 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6279 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 25.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 25.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Mozambique?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per in Mozambique was 0.0044 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Mozambique?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0076 t per square kilometre in 1981.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per recorded in Mozambique?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0007 t per square kilometre in 2002.
- How does Mozambique rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per?
- Mozambique ranks 155th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, per rising or falling in Mozambique?
- Over the last ten years it is up 96.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mozambique data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.