Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing in Mauritius
Mauritius: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing was 3.72 An per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing in Mauritius, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in An per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Mauritius is 3.72 An per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 3.8% on the previous year and down 24.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Mauritius peaked at 9.36 An per square kilometre in 1964 and was at its lowest, 2.6 An per square kilometre, in 1984.
That places Mauritius 52nd out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 63 years of available data.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing in Mauritius, year by year
| Year | An per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 6.9 An per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 6.9 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 8.87 An per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1964 | 9.36 An per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1965 | 7.39 An per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 1966 | 6.9 An per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1967 | 8.37 An per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 1968 | 8.37 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 8.37 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 8.37 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 8.37 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 6.4 An per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1973 | 4.43 An per square kilometre | -30.8% |
| 1974 | 3.94 An per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1975 | 3.94 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1976 | 4.35 An per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 1977 | 5.04 An per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 1978 | 3.8 An per square kilometre | -24.6% |
| 1979 | 4.77 An per square kilometre | +25.7% |
| 1980 | 5.83 An per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 1981 | 3.67 An per square kilometre | -37.0% |
| 1982 | 3.41 An per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1983 | 3.11 An per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 1984 | 2.6 An per square kilometre | -16.5% |
| 1985 | 2.63 An per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1986 | 3.71 An per square kilometre | +41.0% |
| 1987 | 4.76 An per square kilometre | +28.4% |
| 1988 | 5.35 An per square kilometre | +12.4% |
| 1989 | 5.57 An per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1990 | 6.65 An per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1991 | 7.3 An per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 1992 | 7.93 An per square kilometre | +8.7% |
| 1993 | 6.5 An per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1994 | 6.8 An per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1995 | 6.16 An per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1996 | 5.71 An per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 1997 | 5.81 An per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1998 | 7.29 An per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 1999 | 7.24 An per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2000 | 7.49 An per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2001 | 5.91 An per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2002 | 6.5 An per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 2003 | 6.4 An per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2004 | 7.14 An per square kilometre | +11.5% |
| 2005 | 6.63 An per square kilometre | -7.2% |
| 2006 | 6.92 An per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2007 | 4.19 An per square kilometre | -39.4% |
| 2008 | 6.21 An per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 2009 | 5.91 An per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2010 | 4.93 An per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 2011 | 6.01 An per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2012 | 5.21 An per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2013 | 4.89 An per square kilometre | -6.2% |
| 2014 | 4.48 An per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2015 | 4.03 An per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 2016 | 3.57 An per square kilometre | -11.5% |
| 2017 | 3.58 An per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2018 | 3.73 An per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2019 | 3.66 An per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2020 | 3.27 An per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2021 | 3.25 An per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2022 | 3.87 An per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 2023 | 3.72 An per square kilometre | -3.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.94 An per square kilometre | 6.9 An per square kilometre | 9.36 An per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 5.34 An per square kilometre | 3.8 An per square kilometre | 8.37 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.06 An per square kilometre | 2.6 An per square kilometre | 5.83 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.74 An per square kilometre | 5.71 An per square kilometre | 7.93 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.33 An per square kilometre | 4.19 An per square kilometre | 7.49 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.41 An per square kilometre | 3.57 An per square kilometre | 6.01 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.53 An per square kilometre | 3.25 An per square kilometre | 3.87 An per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mauritius
More agriculture & rural data for Mauritius
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 17.99 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0462 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 599.72 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.1976 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6096 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Mauritius?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Mauritius was 3.72 An per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing recorded in Mauritius?
- The highest recorded value was 9.36 An per square kilometre in 1964.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing recorded in Mauritius?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.6 An per square kilometre in 1984.
- How does Mauritius rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Mauritius ranks 52nd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing rising or falling in Mauritius?
- Over the last ten years it is down 24.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Mauritius data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.