Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing in Guatemala
Guatemala: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing was 10.63 An per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing in Guatemala, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in An per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Guatemala stood at 10.63 An per square kilometre.
That represents a change of up 2.5% on the previous year and up 45.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Guatemala peaked at 11.04 An per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 1.92 An per square kilometre, in 1986.
That places Guatemala 17th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing in Guatemala, year by year
| Year | An per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.97 An per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 2.18 An per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1963 | 2.55 An per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1964 | 2.5 An per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1965 | 2.44 An per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1966 | 2.39 An per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1967 | 2.61 An per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 1968 | 2.97 An per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1969 | 3 An per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1970 | 2.96 An per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 1971 | 3.21 An per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 1972 | 3.28 An per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1973 | 3.1 An per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1974 | 2.77 An per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1975 | 3.11 An per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 1976 | 3.61 An per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1977 | 3.86 An per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1978 | 3.86 An per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1979 | 3.6 An per square kilometre | -6.5% |
| 1980 | 3.01 An per square kilometre | -16.4% |
| 1981 | 3.03 An per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 1982 | 2.73 An per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1983 | 2.95 An per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1984 | 2.94 An per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 1985 | 2.7 An per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1986 | 1.92 An per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 1987 | 2.47 An per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1988 | 2.82 An per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1989 | 3.51 An per square kilometre | +24.5% |
| 1990 | 3.43 An per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 1991 | 2.66 An per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1992 | 2.09 An per square kilometre | -21.5% |
| 1993 | 2.48 An per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1994 | 2.67 An per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1995 | 2.77 An per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1996 | 2.79 An per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1997 | 2.82 An per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 2.84 An per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1999 | 3.32 An per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2000 | 3.27 An per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2001 | 3.27 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 3.31 An per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2003 | 3.31 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 3.31 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 3.31 An per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 3.36 An per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 3.49 An per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2008 | 3.76 An per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 2009 | 4.74 An per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 2010 | 5.35 An per square kilometre | +12.9% |
| 2011 | 6.02 An per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2012 | 6.87 An per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2013 | 7.3 An per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2014 | 8.94 An per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 2015 | 9.15 An per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2016 | 9.38 An per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2017 | 9.58 An per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2018 | 9.38 An per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2019 | 9.67 An per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2020 | 9.86 An per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2021 | 11.04 An per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2022 | 10.36 An per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2023 | 10.63 An per square kilometre | +2.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.51 An per square kilometre | 1.97 An per square kilometre | 3 An per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.34 An per square kilometre | 2.77 An per square kilometre | 3.86 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.81 An per square kilometre | 1.92 An per square kilometre | 3.51 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.79 An per square kilometre | 2.09 An per square kilometre | 3.43 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.51 An per square kilometre | 3.27 An per square kilometre | 4.74 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.16 An per square kilometre | 5.35 An per square kilometre | 9.67 An per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.47 An per square kilometre | 9.86 An per square kilometre | 11.04 An per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Guatemala
More agriculture & rural data for Guatemala
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 7.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0955 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 630.24 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.74 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.437 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.6% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.6% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.8% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Guatemala?
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing in Guatemala was 10.63 An per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing recorded in Guatemala?
- The highest recorded value was 11.04 An per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing recorded in Guatemala?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.92 An per square kilometre in 1986.
- How does Guatemala rank for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Guatemala ranks 17th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing rising or falling in Guatemala?
- Over the last ten years it is up 45.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Guatemala data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.