Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia
Latvia: Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia, 1995–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, measured in 2017.
That represents a change of down 20.3% on the previous year and down 37.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia peaked at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
That places Latvia 60th out of 117 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 1997 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -27.2% |
| 1998 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 1999 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +20.8% |
| 2000 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -47.3% |
| 2001 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +51.3% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +34.6% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -43.9% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -7.3% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -42.9% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -43.3% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +33.3% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +12.9% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +7.9% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, 3.7× the median. (52 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, 72% of the median. (42 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 8 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia?
- Cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) in Latvia was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 1995.
- What is the lowest cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Latvia rank for cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- Latvia ranks 60th out of 117 countries with data for 2017.
- Is cucumbers and gherkins — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 37.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cucumbers and gherkins — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.