Crustaceans — Stock Variation in St. Kitts and Nevis
St. Kitts and Nevis: Crustaceans — Stock Variation was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat
Crustaceans — Stock Variation in St. Kitts and Nevis, 2010–2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.
Analysis
In 2023, crustaceans — stock variation in St. Kitts and Nevis stood at 0 1000 t. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.
Over the whole period, crustaceans — stock variation in St. Kitts and Nevis peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.
St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd of 103 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 0 1000 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near St. Kitts and Nevis
- 1 Ireland 6 1000 t compare
- 2 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
- 2 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Albania 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
- 2 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Oman 0 1000 t compare
- 2 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Israel 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Lithuania, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Finland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Chile 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mozambique, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Latvia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Norway 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Panama 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Romania 0 1000 t compare
- 2 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Belize 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Canada 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
- 2 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Poland, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
- 2 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Australia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
- 2 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
- 2 France 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
- 2 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
- 2 India 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Germany 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Italy 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Spain 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Peru 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
- 2 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
- 2 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
- 2 China, People's Republic of 0 1000 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for St. Kitts and Nevis
- Agriculture share gdp 1.29 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 1.29 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.1% (2017)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.9% (2017)
- Rural population 68.1% (2025)
- Rural population growth 0.0% (2025)
- Rural population 31,954 (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 1.3% (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added 15.26 million current US$ (2025)
- Tomatoes — Production 114.89 t (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is crustaceans — stock variation in St. Kitts and Nevis?
- Crustaceans — stock variation in St. Kitts and Nevis was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest crustaceans — stock variation recorded in St. Kitts and Nevis?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- What is the lowest crustaceans — stock variation recorded in St. Kitts and Nevis?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
- How does St. Kitts and Nevis rank for crustaceans — stock variation?
- St. Kitts and Nevis ranks 2nd out of 103 countries with data for 2023.
- Where does this St. Kitts and Nevis data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Crustaceans — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.