Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP in Latvia
Latvia: Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP in Latvia, 1995–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp in Latvia is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 31 years on record.
The figure is down 8.4% on the previous year and down 37.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp in Latvia peaked at 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2025.
That places Latvia 84th out of 188 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP in Latvia, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1996 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 1997 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1998 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -31.7% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +32.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +10.0% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.8% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -0.4% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.6% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +17.0% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.3% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.4% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2024 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2025 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 5 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate 1.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per capita 0.7728 hectares per person (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, annual growth rate 0.3717 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP 0 hectares per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita 1.08 hectares per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp in Latvia?
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp in Latvia was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1996.
- What is the lowest cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2025.
- How does Latvia rank for cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 84th out of 188 countries with data for 2025.
- Is cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 37.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cropland extent over the long-term ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cropland extent over the long-term HYDE (2025) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cropland extent over the long-term divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.