Cow peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Uganda
Uganda: Cow peas, dry — Gross Production Value was 4,196 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cow peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Uganda, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, cow peas, dry — gross production value in Uganda stood at 4,196 1000 Int$.
The figure is down 0.4% on the previous year and down 1.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cow peas, dry — gross production value in Uganda peaked at 23,719 1000 Int$ in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3,007 1000 Int$, in 2008.
Uganda ranks 24th of 47 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cow peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Uganda, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 15,033 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 16,704 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1963 | 15,033 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1964 | 16,704 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1965 | 13,363 1000 Int$ | -20.0% |
| 1966 | 7,807 1000 Int$ | -41.6% |
| 1967 | 20,378 1000 Int$ | +161.0% |
| 1968 | 21,381 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 1969 | 18,588 1000 Int$ | -13.1% |
| 1970 | 16,704 1000 Int$ | -10.1% |
| 1971 | 15,033 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 1972 | 20,679 1000 Int$ | +37.6% |
| 1973 | 16,804 1000 Int$ | -18.7% |
| 1974 | 21,347 1000 Int$ | +27.0% |
| 1975 | 19,009 1000 Int$ | -11.0% |
| 1976 | 10,356 1000 Int$ | -45.5% |
| 1977 | 10,523 1000 Int$ | +1.6% |
| 1978 | 10,456 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 1979 | 7,350 1000 Int$ | -29.7% |
| 1980 | 5,345 1000 Int$ | -27.3% |
| 1981 | 6,013 1000 Int$ | +12.5% |
| 1982 | 6,681 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 1983 | 12,427 1000 Int$ | +86.0% |
| 1984 | 13,029 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1985 | 11,693 1000 Int$ | -10.3% |
| 1986 | 13,029 1000 Int$ | +11.4% |
| 1987 | 12,361 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 1988 | 12,695 1000 Int$ | +2.7% |
| 1989 | 12,547 1000 Int$ | -1.2% |
| 1990 | 13,029 1000 Int$ | +3.8% |
| 1991 | 13,363 1000 Int$ | +2.6% |
| 1992 | 13,697 1000 Int$ | +2.5% |
| 1993 | 14,365 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 1994 | 15,033 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1995 | 15,033 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 15,701 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1997 | 15,367 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 1998 | 16,704 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 1999 | 20,712 1000 Int$ | +24.0% |
| 2000 | 20,044 1000 Int$ | -3.2% |
| 2001 | 19,710 1000 Int$ | -1.7% |
| 2002 | 19,844 1000 Int$ | +0.7% |
| 2003 | 22,383 1000 Int$ | +12.8% |
| 2004 | 23,051 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2005 | 23,385 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2006 | 23,719 1000 Int$ | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 23,719 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 3,007 1000 Int$ | -87.3% |
| 2009 | 3,675 1000 Int$ | +22.2% |
| 2010 | 4,009 1000 Int$ | +9.1% |
| 2011 | 4,129 1000 Int$ | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 3,386 1000 Int$ | -18.0% |
| 2013 | 4,233 1000 Int$ | +25.0% |
| 2014 | 4,237 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2015 | 4,241 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 3,819 1000 Int$ | -10.0% |
| 2017 | 4,247 1000 Int$ | +11.2% |
| 2018 | 4,156 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 2019 | 4,131 1000 Int$ | -0.6% |
| 2020 | 4,263 1000 Int$ | +3.2% |
| 2021 | 4,183 1000 Int$ | -1.9% |
| 2022 | 4,193 1000 Int$ | +0.2% |
| 2023 | 4,213 1000 Int$ | +0.5% |
| 2024 | 4,196 1000 Int$ | -0.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 16,110 1000 Int$ | 7,807 1000 Int$ | 21,381 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 14,826 1000 Int$ | 7,350 1000 Int$ | 21,347 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 10,582 1000 Int$ | 5,345 1000 Int$ | 13,029 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 15,300 1000 Int$ | 13,029 1000 Int$ | 20,712 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 18,254 1000 Int$ | 3,007 1000 Int$ | 23,719 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 4,059 1000 Int$ | 3,386 1000 Int$ | 4,247 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 4,210 1000 Int$ | 4,183 1000 Int$ | 4,263 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uganda
- 21 Serbia 5,244 1000 Int$ compare
- 22 China 4,803 1000 Int$ compare
- 22 China, mainland 4,803 1000 Int$ compare
- 25 Sri Lanka 3,813 1000 Int$ compare
- 26 Mauritania 2,655 1000 Int$ compare
- 27 North Macedonia 2,558 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Uganda
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 22.05 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2613 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 315.24 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.75 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0006 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6806 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 26.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 26.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.2% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cow peas, dry — gross production value in Uganda?
- Cow peas, dry — gross production value in Uganda was 4,196 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest cow peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Uganda?
- The highest recorded value was 23,719 1000 Int$ in 2006.
- What is the lowest cow peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Uganda?
- The lowest recorded value was 3,007 1000 Int$ in 2008.
- How does Uganda rank for cow peas, dry — gross production value?
- Uganda ranks 24th out of 47 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cow peas, dry — gross production value rising or falling in Uganda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uganda data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Cow peas, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.