Statizoid

Cottonseed Oil β€” Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Cottonseed Oil β€” Stock Variation was 8 1000 t in 2023. β—† Volatile

Latest (2023)
8 1000 t
Change on year
up 214.3%
Rank
11th
of 31 groups
All-time high
43 1000 t
in 2012
All-time low
-60 1000 t
in 2017
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Cottonseed Oil β€” Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 2010–2023

-50-25025502010201620232010: 5 1000 t2011: -10 1000 t2012: 43 1000 t2013: 10 1000 t2014: 25 1000 t2015: 22 1000 t2016: 9 1000 t2017: -60 1000 t2018: -29 1000 t2019: 2 1000 t2020: 9 1000 t2021: 17 1000 t2022: -7 1000 t2023: 8 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

The most recent figure for cottonseed oil β€” stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) is 8 1000 t, measured in 2023.

That represents a change of up 214.3% on the previous year and down 20.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cottonseed oil β€” stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 43 1000 t in 2012 and was at its lowest, -60 1000 t, in 2017.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th of 31 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 1.7 1000 t -60 1000 t 43 1000 t 10
2020s 6.75 1000 t -7 1000 t 17 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

  1. 9 Bulgaria 1 1000 t compare
  2. 9 Ethiopia 1 1000 t compare
  3. 11 Marshall Islands 0 1000 t compare
  4. 11 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  5. 11 Bahrain 0 1000 t compare
  6. 11 Democratic People's Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  7. 11 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  8. 11 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
  9. 11 Saint Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  10. 11 Micronesia 0 1000 t compare
  11. 11 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  12. 11 Tajikistan 0 1000 t compare
  13. 11 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  14. 11 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  15. 11 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  16. 11 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  17. 11 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  18. 11 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  19. 11 Cabo Verde 0 1000 t compare
  20. 11 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  21. 11 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  22. 11 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  23. 11 Armenia 0 1000 t compare
  24. 11 Bahamas 0 1000 t compare
  25. 11 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  26. 11 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  27. 11 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  28. 11 Estonia 0 1000 t compare
  29. 11 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  30. 11 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 1000 t compare
  31. 11 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  32. 11 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  33. 11 Gambia 0 1000 t compare
  34. 11 Kyrgyzstan 0 1000 t compare
  35. 11 North Macedonia 0 1000 t compare
  36. 11 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  37. 11 Azerbaijan 0 1000 t compare
  38. 11 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  39. 11 Lithuania 0 1000 t compare
  40. 11 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  41. 11 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  42. 11 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  43. 11 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  44. 11 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  45. 11 Eswatini 0 1000 t compare
  46. 11 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  47. 11 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  48. 11 Congo 0 1000 t compare
  49. 11 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  50. 11 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  51. 11 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  52. 11 Belarus 0 1000 t compare
  53. 11 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  54. 11 Croatia 0 1000 t compare
  55. 11 Papua New Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  56. 11 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  57. 11 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  58. 11 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  59. 11 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  60. 11 Latvia 0 1000 t compare
  61. 11 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  62. 11 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  63. 11 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  64. 11 Viet Nam 0 1000 t compare
  65. 11 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  66. 11 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  67. 11 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  68. 11 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  69. 11 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  70. 11 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  71. 11 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  72. 11 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  73. 11 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  74. 11 Serbia 0 1000 t compare
  75. 11 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  76. 11 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  77. 11 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  78. 11 Slovakia 0 1000 t compare
  79. 11 Czechia 0 1000 t compare
  80. 11 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  81. 11 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  82. 11 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  83. 11 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  84. 11 Yemen 0 1000 t compare
  85. 11 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  86. 11 Fiji 0 1000 t compare
  87. 11 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  88. 11 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  89. 11 Poland 0 1000 t compare
  90. 11 Slovenia 0 1000 t compare
  91. 11 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  92. 11 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  93. 11 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  94. 11 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  95. 11 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  96. 11 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  97. 11 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  98. 11 Syrian Arab Republic 0 1000 t compare
  99. 11 Madagascar 0 1000 t compare
  100. 11 France 0 1000 t compare
  101. 11 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  102. 11 Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  103. 11 Mozambique 0 1000 t compare
  104. 11 Democratic Republic of the Congo 0 1000 t compare
  105. 11 Bolivia (Plurinational State of) 0 1000 t compare
  106. 11 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  107. 11 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  108. 11 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  109. 11 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  110. 11 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  111. 11 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  112. 11 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  113. 11 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  114. 11 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  115. 11 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  116. 11 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  117. 11 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  118. 11 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  119. 11 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  120. 11 Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 0 1000 t compare
  121. 11 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  122. 11 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  123. 11 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  124. 11 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  125. 11 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  126. 11 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  127. 11 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  128. 11 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  129. 11 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  130. 11 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  131. 11 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  132. 11 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  133. 11 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  134. 11 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  135. 11 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  136. 11 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  137. 11 United Republic of Tanzania 0 1000 t compare
  138. 11 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  139. 11 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  140. 11 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  141. 11 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  142. 11 Melanesia 0 1000 t compare
  143. 11 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  144. 11 Kenya 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 193 places β†’

More agriculture & rural data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

All data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is cottonseed oil β€” stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Cottonseed oil β€” stock variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 8 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest cottonseed oil β€” stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The highest recorded value was 43 1000 t in 2012.
What is the lowest cottonseed oil β€” stock variation recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
The lowest recorded value was -60 1000 t in 2017.
How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for cottonseed oil β€” stock variation?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 11th out of 31 groups with data for 2023.
Is cottonseed oil β€” stock variation rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Over the last ten years it is down 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Cottonseed Oil β€” Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cottonseed Oil β€” Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/cottonseed-oil-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/cottonseed-oil-stock-variation/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Cottonseed Oil β€” Stock Variation in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cottonseed Oil β€” Stock Variation
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 2,455 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.