Cotton lint — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries
Low Income Food Deficit Countries: Cotton lint — Stock Variation was 156,420 t in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Cotton lint — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, 1961–2013
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in t.
Analysis
In 2013, cotton lint — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries stood at 156,420 t.
The figure is up 38.4% on the previous year and up 637.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cotton lint — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries peaked at 329,450 t in 2007 and was at its lowest, -265,210 t, in 2001.
Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 2nd of 27 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cotton lint — Stock Variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries, year by year
| Year | t | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | -1,300 t | — |
| 1962 | -92,450 t | +7011.5% |
| 1963 | 31,050 t | -133.6% |
| 1964 | 26,550 t | -14.5% |
| 1965 | -39,150 t | -247.5% |
| 1966 | -29,900 t | -23.6% |
| 1967 | -11,950 t | -60.0% |
| 1968 | -3,400 t | -71.5% |
| 1969 | -82,200 t | +2317.6% |
| 1970 | 12,750 t | -115.5% |
| 1971 | 15,000 t | +17.6% |
| 1972 | 6,800 t | -54.7% |
| 1973 | 52,300 t | +669.1% |
| 1974 | -200,200 t | -482.8% |
| 1975 | -144,000 t | -28.1% |
| 1976 | 97,550 t | -167.7% |
| 1977 | 42,100 t | -56.8% |
| 1978 | -54,150 t | -228.6% |
| 1979 | 66,800 t | -223.4% |
| 1980 | 58,600 t | -12.3% |
| 1981 | -40 t | -100.1% |
| 1982 | -54,760 t | +136800.0% |
| 1983 | -32,500 t | -40.7% |
| 1984 | -25,020 t | -23.0% |
| 1985 | -167,680 t | +570.2% |
| 1986 | 68,600 t | -140.9% |
| 1987 | 47,350 t | -31.0% |
| 1988 | -19,200 t | -140.5% |
| 1989 | 109,500 t | -670.3% |
| 1990 | -15,950 t | -114.6% |
| 1991 | -38,600 t | +142.0% |
| 1992 | 29,550 t | -176.6% |
| 1993 | -39,750 t | -234.5% |
| 1994 | -6,800 t | -82.9% |
| 1995 | -67,700 t | +895.6% |
| 1996 | -167,750 t | +147.8% |
| 1997 | -129,200 t | -23.0% |
| 1998 | -35,850 t | -72.3% |
| 1999 | -36,750 t | +2.5% |
| 2000 | 51,706 t | -240.7% |
| 2001 | -265,210 t | -612.9% |
| 2002 | 12,095 t | -104.6% |
| 2003 | 21,210 t | +75.4% |
| 2004 | 60,990 t | +187.6% |
| 2005 | 47,920 t | -21.4% |
| 2006 | 103,575 t | +116.1% |
| 2007 | 329,450 t | +218.1% |
| 2008 | 88,500 t | -73.1% |
| 2009 | 114,500 t | +29.4% |
| 2010 | -65,600 t | -157.3% |
| 2011 | 42,450 t | -164.7% |
| 2012 | 113,000 t | +166.2% |
| 2013 | 156,420 t | +38.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -22,528 t | -92,450 t | 31,050 t | 9 |
| 1970s | -10,505 t | -200,200 t | 97,550 t | 10 |
| 1980s | -1,515 t | -167,680 t | 109,500 t | 10 |
| 1990s | -50,880 t | -167,750 t | 29,550 t | 10 |
| 2000s | 56,474 t | -265,210 t | 329,450 t | 10 |
| 2010s | 61,568 t | -65,600 t | 156,420 t | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- 1 Australia 156,000 t compare
- 1 Australia and New Zealand 156,000 t compare
- 3 Mali 50,000 t compare
- 4 Benin 49,800 t compare
- 5 C�te d'Ivoire 18,000 t compare
More agriculture & rural data for Low Income Food Deficit Countries
- Brans — Feed 33.02 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Stock Variation -3.75 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Export Quantity 3.26 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Domestic supply quantity 78.05 million t (2013)
- Cotton lint — Other uses 8.00 million t (2013)
- Cotton lint — Domestic supply quantity 8.00 million t (2013)
- Cotton lint — Import Quantity 1.02 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Seed 2.32 million t (2013)
- Oilcrops — Processing 48.15 million t (2013)
- Soyabean Cake — Feed 4.13 million t (2013)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cotton lint — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Cotton lint — stock variation in Low Income Food Deficit Countries was 156,420 t in 2013, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest cotton lint — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The highest recorded value was 329,450 t in 2007.
- What is the lowest cotton lint — stock variation recorded in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- The lowest recorded value was -265,210 t in 2001.
- How does Low Income Food Deficit Countries rank for cotton lint — stock variation?
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries ranks 2nd out of 27 groups with data for 2013.
- Is cotton lint — stock variation rising or falling in Low Income Food Deficit Countries?
- Over the last ten years it is up 637.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low Income Food Deficit Countries data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Cotton lint — Stock Variation. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
Food Balance Sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per caput food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.