Coffee, green — Gross Production Value in Ecuador
Ecuador: Coffee, green — Gross Production Value was 11,420 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
11,420 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 2.1%
World rank
37th
of 75 countries
All-time high
390,345 1000 Int$
in 1994
All-time low
8,159 1000 Int$
in 2016
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Coffee, green — Gross Production Value in Ecuador, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 11,420 1000 Int$ for coffee, green — gross production value in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.1% on the previous year and up 29.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coffee, green — gross production value in Ecuador peaked at 390,345 1000 Int$ in 1994 and was at its lowest, 8,159 1000 Int$, in 2016.
That places Ecuador 37th out of 75 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Coffee, green — Gross Production Value in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 111,798 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 115,977 1000 Int$ | +3.7% |
| 1963 | 89,438 1000 Int$ | -22.9% |
| 1964 | 98,215 1000 Int$ | +9.8% |
| 1965 | 138,336 1000 Int$ | +40.9% |
| 1966 | 119,575 1000 Int$ | -13.6% |
| 1967 | 128,998 1000 Int$ | +7.9% |
| 1968 | 126,411 1000 Int$ | -2.0% |
| 1969 | 92,667 1000 Int$ | -26.7% |
| 1970 | 150,567 1000 Int$ | +62.5% |
| 1971 | 130,086 1000 Int$ | -13.6% |
| 1972 | 149,171 1000 Int$ | +14.7% |
| 1973 | 156,684 1000 Int$ | +5.0% |
| 1974 | 145,521 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 1975 | 159,728 1000 Int$ | +9.8% |
| 1976 | 182,013 1000 Int$ | +14.0% |
| 1977 | 172,774 1000 Int$ | -5.1% |
| 1978 | 157,660 1000 Int$ | -8.7% |
| 1979 | 187,502 1000 Int$ | +18.9% |
| 1980 | 145,117 1000 Int$ | -22.6% |
| 1981 | 179,890 1000 Int$ | +24.0% |
| 1982 | 175,403 1000 Int$ | -2.5% |
| 1983 | 169,420 1000 Int$ | -3.4% |
| 1984 | 203,237 1000 Int$ | +20.0% |
| 1985 | 252,560 1000 Int$ | +24.3% |
| 1986 | 246,581 1000 Int$ | -2.4% |
| 1987 | 233,458 1000 Int$ | -5.3% |
| 1988 | 301,751 1000 Int$ | +29.3% |
| 1989 | 270,214 1000 Int$ | -10.5% |
| 1990 | 282,064 1000 Int$ | +4.4% |
| 1991 | 244,318 1000 Int$ | -13.4% |
| 1992 | 287,687 1000 Int$ | +17.8% |
| 1993 | 286,294 1000 Int$ | -0.5% |
| 1994 | 390,345 1000 Int$ | +36.3% |
| 1995 | 309,700 1000 Int$ | -20.7% |
| 1996 | 352,986 1000 Int$ | +14.0% |
| 1997 | 363,327 1000 Int$ | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 100,701 1000 Int$ | -72.3% |
| 1999 | 277,799 1000 Int$ | +175.9% |
| 2000 | 57,688 1000 Int$ | -79.2% |
| 2001 | 344,357 1000 Int$ | +496.9% |
| 2002 | 48,742 1000 Int$ | -85.8% |
| 2003 | 49,272 1000 Int$ | +1.1% |
| 2004 | 58,369 1000 Int$ | +18.5% |
| 2005 | 85,269 1000 Int$ | +46.1% |
| 2006 | 65,743 1000 Int$ | -22.9% |
| 2007 | 80,843 1000 Int$ | +23.0% |
| 2008 | 67,070 1000 Int$ | -17.0% |
| 2009 | 70,263 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 2010 | 65,505 1000 Int$ | -6.8% |
| 2011 | 49,795 1000 Int$ | -24.0% |
| 2012 | 15,338 1000 Int$ | -69.2% |
| 2013 | 16,216 1000 Int$ | +5.7% |
| 2014 | 8,828 1000 Int$ | -45.6% |
| 2015 | 11,070 1000 Int$ | +25.4% |
| 2016 | 8,159 1000 Int$ | -26.3% |
| 2017 | 15,806 1000 Int$ | +93.7% |
| 2018 | 10,584 1000 Int$ | -33.0% |
| 2019 | 17,012 1000 Int$ | +60.7% |
| 2020 | 11,034 1000 Int$ | -35.1% |
| 2021 | 10,275 1000 Int$ | -6.9% |
| 2022 | 16,646 1000 Int$ | +62.0% |
| 2023 | 11,669 1000 Int$ | -29.9% |
| 2024 | 11,420 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 113,491 1000 Int$ | 89,438 1000 Int$ | 138,336 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 159,171 1000 Int$ | 130,086 1000 Int$ | 187,502 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 217,763 1000 Int$ | 145,117 1000 Int$ | 301,751 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 289,522 1000 Int$ | 100,701 1000 Int$ | 390,345 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 92,762 1000 Int$ | 48,742 1000 Int$ | 344,357 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 21,831 1000 Int$ | 8,159 1000 Int$ | 65,505 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 12,209 1000 Int$ | 10,275 1000 Int$ | 16,646 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 9.7 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 9.7 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coffee, green — gross production value in Ecuador?
- Coffee, green — gross production value in Ecuador was 11,420 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest coffee, green — gross production value recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 390,345 1000 Int$ in 1994.
- What is the lowest coffee, green — gross production value recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 8,159 1000 Int$ in 2016.
- How does Ecuador rank for coffee, green — gross production value?
- Ecuador ranks 37th out of 75 countries with data for 2024.
- Is coffee, green — gross production value rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Coffee, green — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.