Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Japan
Japan: Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre was 2.11 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Japan, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Japan is 2.11 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is down 0.1% on the previous year and down 22.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Japan peaked at 11.68 t per square kilometre in 1979 and was at its lowest, 2.11 t per square kilometre, in 2023.
Japan ranks 37th of 138 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre in Japan, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 3.03 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 3.09 t per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1963 | 3.18 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 4.11 t per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 1965 | 4.47 t per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 1966 | 5.6 t per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 1967 | 5.21 t per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1968 | 7.36 t per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 1969 | 6.74 t per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1970 | 7.94 t per square kilometre | +17.8% |
| 1971 | 8.02 t per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1972 | 10.89 t per square kilometre | +35.8% |
| 1973 | 10.74 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1974 | 10.61 t per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 1975 | 11.61 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1976 | 9.97 t per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 1977 | 11.07 t per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 1978 | 9.93 t per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 1979 | 11.68 t per square kilometre | +17.6% |
| 1980 | 9.81 t per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 1981 | 9.28 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1982 | 9.83 t per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1983 | 9.95 t per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1984 | 7.47 t per square kilometre | -24.9% |
| 1985 | 8.78 t per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 1986 | 7.93 t per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1987 | 9.04 t per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1988 | 7.33 t per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1989 | 7.21 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 1990 | 6.07 t per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 1991 | 5.66 t per square kilometre | -6.7% |
| 1992 | 6.08 t per square kilometre | +7.3% |
| 1993 | 5.25 t per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1994 | 4.62 t per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1995 | 4.83 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1996 | 4.26 t per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 1997 | 5.4 t per square kilometre | +26.9% |
| 1998 | 4.38 t per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1999 | 4.98 t per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2000 | 4.12 t per square kilometre | -17.2% |
| 2001 | 4.48 t per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2002 | 3.93 t per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2003 | 3.9 t per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2004 | 3.68 t per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 2005 | 3.76 t per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2006 | 2.87 t per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 2007 | 3.44 t per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 2008 | 2.99 t per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 2009 | 3.23 t per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2010 | 2.59 t per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 2011 | 2.94 t per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 2012 | 2.65 t per square kilometre | -9.8% |
| 2013 | 2.74 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 2014 | 2.64 t per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 2015 | 2.36 t per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2016 | 2.46 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2017 | 2.27 t per square kilometre | -7.6% |
| 2018 | 2.36 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2019 | 2.29 t per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2020 | 2.34 t per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2021 | 2.29 t per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2022 | 2.11 t per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2023 | 2.11 t per square kilometre | -0.1% |
Japan compared with similar countries
- Japan's 2.11 t per square kilometre is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.106 t per square kilometre, 19.9× the median. (48 countries reporting)
- Japan's 2.11 t per square kilometre is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.339 t per square kilometre, 6.2× the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.75 t per square kilometre | 3.03 t per square kilometre | 7.36 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 10.25 t per square kilometre | 7.94 t per square kilometre | 11.68 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 8.66 t per square kilometre | 7.21 t per square kilometre | 9.95 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.15 t per square kilometre | 4.26 t per square kilometre | 6.08 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.64 t per square kilometre | 2.87 t per square kilometre | 4.48 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.53 t per square kilometre | 2.27 t per square kilometre | 2.94 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.21 t per square kilometre | 2.11 t per square kilometre | 2.34 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Japan
More agriculture & rural data for Japan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.95 % change on previous year (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0096 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 323.87 current US$ per person (2024)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.89 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.077 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 1.0% (2024)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 1.0% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.6% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Japan?
- Citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre in Japan was 2.11 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre recorded in Japan?
- The highest recorded value was 11.68 t per square kilometre in 1979.
- What is the lowest citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre recorded in Japan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2.11 t per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Japan rank for citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre?
- Japan ranks 37th out of 138 countries with data for 2023.
- Is citrus fruit, total — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Japan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 22.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Japan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Citrus Fruit, Total — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.