Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate was 10.71 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
10.71 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 153.0%
World rank
12th
of 150 countries
All-time high
20.53 % change on previous year
in 1993
All-time low
-10.11 % change on previous year
in 1976
Years of data
63
1962–2024
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe stood at 10.71 % change on previous year.
The figure is up 153.0% on the previous year and up 156.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe peaked at 20.53 % change on previous year in 1993 and was at its lowest, -10.11 % change on previous year, in 1976.
Zimbabwe ranks 12th of 150 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 14.63 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 4.68 % change on previous year | -68.0% |
| 1964 | 4.88 % change on previous year | +4.2% |
| 1965 | 3.88 % change on previous year | -20.5% |
| 1966 | 2.61 % change on previous year | -32.6% |
| 1967 | 3.64 % change on previous year | +39.2% |
| 1968 | 5.26 % change on previous year | +44.7% |
| 1969 | 6.67 % change on previous year | +26.7% |
| 1970 | 4.69 % change on previous year | -29.7% |
| 1971 | 5.97 % change on previous year | +27.4% |
| 1972 | 7.04 % change on previous year | +18.0% |
| 1973 | 3.95 % change on previous year | -43.9% |
| 1974 | 5.06 % change on previous year | +28.3% |
| 1975 | 6.02 % change on previous year | +19.0% |
| 1976 | -10.11 % change on previous year | -267.9% |
| 1977 | 10.75 % change on previous year | -206.3% |
| 1978 | -4.54 % change on previous year | -142.2% |
| 1979 | 7.36 % change on previous year | -262.2% |
| 1980 | -0.8799 % change on previous year | -111.9% |
| 1981 | 7.2 % change on previous year | -918.3% |
| 1982 | -1.57 % change on previous year | -121.8% |
| 1983 | 4.9 % change on previous year | -411.6% |
| 1984 | 0.6294 % change on previous year | -87.2% |
| 1985 | 8.49 % change on previous year | +1249.6% |
| 1986 | 5.95 % change on previous year | -29.9% |
| 1987 | 5.67 % change on previous year | -4.7% |
| 1988 | 10.63 % change on previous year | +87.5% |
| 1989 | 9.91 % change on previous year | -6.8% |
| 1990 | 11.59 % change on previous year | +17.0% |
| 1991 | 1.23 % change on previous year | -89.4% |
| 1992 | -9 % change on previous year | -830.6% |
| 1993 | 20.53 % change on previous year | -328.2% |
| 1994 | 5.55 % change on previous year | -73.0% |
| 1995 | -6.82 % change on previous year | -223.0% |
| 1996 | 2.86 % change on previous year | -141.9% |
| 1997 | 1.56 % change on previous year | -45.6% |
| 1998 | -1.91 % change on previous year | -222.6% |
| 1999 | 8.35 % change on previous year | -537.6% |
| 2000 | 4.84 % change on previous year | -42.0% |
| 2001 | 2.45 % change on previous year | -49.4% |
| 2002 | 2.68 % change on previous year | +9.6% |
| 2003 | 3.29 % change on previous year | +22.8% |
| 2004 | 3.02 % change on previous year | -8.4% |
| 2005 | 1.9 % change on previous year | -37.0% |
| 2006 | 2.71 % change on previous year | +42.4% |
| 2007 | 1.78 % change on previous year | -34.3% |
| 2008 | 7.16 % change on previous year | +302.4% |
| 2009 | 11.64 % change on previous year | +62.6% |
| 2010 | -6.33 % change on previous year | -154.3% |
| 2011 | 9.19 % change on previous year | -245.2% |
| 2012 | 4.69 % change on previous year | -49.0% |
| 2013 | 3.92 % change on previous year | -16.3% |
| 2014 | 4.18 % change on previous year | +6.6% |
| 2015 | 4.22 % change on previous year | +1.0% |
| 2016 | 3.17 % change on previous year | -24.9% |
| 2017 | 4.06 % change on previous year | +28.1% |
| 2018 | 1.99 % change on previous year | -50.9% |
| 2019 | 8.62 % change on previous year | +332.1% |
| 2020 | 10.68 % change on previous year | +23.9% |
| 2021 | 4.44 % change on previous year | -58.4% |
| 2022 | 5.66 % change on previous year | +27.4% |
| 2023 | 4.24 % change on previous year | -25.1% |
| 2024 | 10.71 % change on previous year | +153.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.78 % change on previous year | 2.61 % change on previous year | 14.63 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 3.62 % change on previous year | -10.11 % change on previous year | 10.75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.09 % change on previous year | -1.57 % change on previous year | 10.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.39 % change on previous year | -9 % change on previous year | 20.53 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.15 % change on previous year | 1.78 % change on previous year | 11.64 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.77 % change on previous year | -6.33 % change on previous year | 9.19 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.15 % change on previous year | 4.24 % change on previous year | 10.71 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More agriculture & rural data for Zimbabwe
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 34.41 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0947 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 286.19 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8815 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.595 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe?
- Citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate in Zimbabwe was 10.71 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 20.53 % change on previous year in 1993.
- What is the lowest citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was -10.11 % change on previous year in 1976.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate?
- Zimbabwe ranks 12th out of 150 countries with data for 2024.
- Is citrus fruit, total — production, annual growth rate rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 156.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Citrus Fruit, Total — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Citrus Fruit, Total — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Citrus Fruit, Total — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Citrus Fruit, Total — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.