Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Pakistan
Pakistan: Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value was 5.04 million 1000 SLC in 2024. ▼ Falling
Latest (2024)
5.04 million 1000 SLC
Change on year
down 14.2%
World rank
6th
of 40 countries
All-time high
20.95 million 1000 SLC
in 2005
All-time low
5.04 million 1000 SLC
in 2024
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Pakistan, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
Pakistan recorded 5.04 million 1000 SLC for chick peas, dry — gross production value in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 64 years on record.
That represents a change of down 14.2% on the previous year and down 47.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, chick peas, dry — gross production value in Pakistan peaked at 20.95 million 1000 SLC in 2005 and was at its lowest, 5.04 million 1000 SLC, in 2024.
Pakistan ranks 6th of 40 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 12.65 million 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 12.92 million 1000 SLC | +2.2% |
| 1963 | 14.15 million 1000 SLC | +9.5% |
| 1964 | 12.65 million 1000 SLC | -10.6% |
| 1965 | 13.94 million 1000 SLC | +10.2% |
| 1966 | 11.19 million 1000 SLC | -19.7% |
| 1967 | 13.18 million 1000 SLC | +17.7% |
| 1968 | 9.97 million 1000 SLC | -24.3% |
| 1969 | 10.96 million 1000 SLC | +9.9% |
| 1970 | 10.50 million 1000 SLC | -4.2% |
| 1971 | 10.25 million 1000 SLC | -2.4% |
| 1972 | 10.59 million 1000 SLC | +3.3% |
| 1973 | 11.49 million 1000 SLC | +8.5% |
| 1974 | 12.68 million 1000 SLC | +10.3% |
| 1975 | 11.42 million 1000 SLC | -10.0% |
| 1976 | 12.48 million 1000 SLC | +9.3% |
| 1977 | 13.47 million 1000 SLC | +8.0% |
| 1978 | 12.73 million 1000 SLC | -5.5% |
| 1979 | 11.16 million 1000 SLC | -12.3% |
| 1980 | 6.50 million 1000 SLC | -41.7% |
| 1981 | 6.99 million 1000 SLC | +7.5% |
| 1982 | 6.09 million 1000 SLC | -12.8% |
| 1983 | 10.19 million 1000 SLC | +67.2% |
| 1984 | 10.83 million 1000 SLC | +6.3% |
| 1985 | 10.87 million 1000 SLC | +0.3% |
| 1986 | 12.16 million 1000 SLC | +11.9% |
| 1987 | 10.23 million 1000 SLC | -15.9% |
| 1988 | 7.71 million 1000 SLC | -24.6% |
| 1989 | 9.46 million 1000 SLC | +22.7% |
| 1990 | 11.66 million 1000 SLC | +23.2% |
| 1991 | 12.81 million 1000 SLC | +9.9% |
| 1992 | 12.37 million 1000 SLC | -3.4% |
| 1993 | 8.38 million 1000 SLC | -32.3% |
| 1994 | 9.91 million 1000 SLC | +18.3% |
| 1995 | 13.47 million 1000 SLC | +36.0% |
| 1996 | 16.39 million 1000 SLC | +21.7% |
| 1997 | 14.34 million 1000 SLC | -12.5% |
| 1998 | 18.51 million 1000 SLC | +29.1% |
| 1999 | 16.84 million 1000 SLC | -9.0% |
| 2000 | 13.62 million 1000 SLC | -19.1% |
| 2001 | 9.58 million 1000 SLC | -29.7% |
| 2002 | 8.74 million 1000 SLC | -8.8% |
| 2003 | 16.29 million 1000 SLC | +86.5% |
| 2004 | 14.74 million 1000 SLC | -9.5% |
| 2005 | 20.95 million 1000 SLC | +42.1% |
| 2006 | 11.57 million 1000 SLC | -44.8% |
| 2007 | 20.22 million 1000 SLC | +74.8% |
| 2008 | 11.45 million 1000 SLC | -43.4% |
| 2009 | 17.86 million 1000 SLC | +56.0% |
| 2010 | 13.55 million 1000 SLC | -24.2% |
| 2011 | 11.97 million 1000 SLC | -11.7% |
| 2012 | 6.86 million 1000 SLC | -42.7% |
| 2013 | 18.12 million 1000 SLC | +164.2% |
| 2014 | 9.63 million 1000 SLC | -46.9% |
| 2015 | 9.15 million 1000 SLC | -5.0% |
| 2016 | 6.90 million 1000 SLC | -24.5% |
| 2017 | 7.96 million 1000 SLC | +15.2% |
| 2018 | 7.80 million 1000 SLC | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 10.77 million 1000 SLC | +38.1% |
| 2020 | 12.00 million 1000 SLC | +11.4% |
| 2021 | 5.64 million 1000 SLC | -53.0% |
| 2022 | 7.63 million 1000 SLC | +35.2% |
| 2023 | 5.88 million 1000 SLC | -23.0% |
| 2024 | 5.04 million 1000 SLC | -14.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.40 million 1000 SLC | 9.97 million 1000 SLC | 14.15 million 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 11.68 million 1000 SLC | 10.25 million 1000 SLC | 13.47 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 9.10 million 1000 SLC | 6.09 million 1000 SLC | 12.16 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 13.47 million 1000 SLC | 8.38 million 1000 SLC | 18.51 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.50 million 1000 SLC | 8.74 million 1000 SLC | 20.95 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 10.27 million 1000 SLC | 6.86 million 1000 SLC | 18.12 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.24 million 1000 SLC | 5.04 million 1000 SLC | 12.00 million 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
More agriculture & rural data for Pakistan
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 6.28 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2302 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 367.4 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.984 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0004 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6047 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 23.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 23.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 4.3% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is chick peas, dry — gross production value in Pakistan?
- Chick peas, dry — gross production value in Pakistan was 5.04 million 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest chick peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 20.95 million 1000 SLC in 2005.
- What is the lowest chick peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 5.04 million 1000 SLC in 2024.
- How does Pakistan rank for chick peas, dry — gross production value?
- Pakistan ranks 6th out of 40 countries with data for 2024.
- Is chick peas, dry — gross production value rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 47.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.