Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Nepal
Nepal: Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value was 828,128 1000 SLC in 2024. ▼ Falling
Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Nepal, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 SLC.
Analysis
In 2024, chick peas, dry — gross production value in Nepal stood at 828,128 1000 SLC.
That represents a change of down 17.0% on the previous year and up 6.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, chick peas, dry — gross production value in Nepal peaked at 2.92 million 1000 SLC in 1982 and was at its lowest, 572,941 1000 SLC, in 2009.
Nepal ranks 12th of 40 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 64 years of available data.
Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Nepal, year by year
| Year | 1000 SLC | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.33 million 1000 SLC | — |
| 1962 | 1.33 million 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 1.37 million 1000 SLC | +3.1% |
| 1964 | 1.37 million 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1965 | 1.37 million 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 1.46 million 1000 SLC | +6.1% |
| 1967 | 1.48 million 1000 SLC | +1.7% |
| 1968 | 1.58 million 1000 SLC | +6.7% |
| 1969 | 1.58 million 1000 SLC | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 1.75 million 1000 SLC | +10.5% |
| 1971 | 1.80 million 1000 SLC | +2.9% |
| 1972 | 1.75 million 1000 SLC | -2.8% |
| 1973 | 1.83 million 1000 SLC | +4.8% |
| 1974 | 1.92 million 1000 SLC | +4.5% |
| 1975 | 2.00 million 1000 SLC | +4.3% |
| 1976 | 2.04 million 1000 SLC | +2.1% |
| 1977 | 2.00 million 1000 SLC | -2.0% |
| 1978 | 2.07 million 1000 SLC | +3.3% |
| 1979 | 2.25 million 1000 SLC | +8.9% |
| 1980 | 2.50 million 1000 SLC | +11.1% |
| 1981 | 2.79 million 1000 SLC | +11.7% |
| 1982 | 2.92 million 1000 SLC | +4.5% |
| 1983 | 2.75 million 1000 SLC | -5.7% |
| 1984 | 2.50 million 1000 SLC | -9.1% |
| 1985 | 1.33 million 1000 SLC | -46.7% |
| 1986 | 1.51 million 1000 SLC | +13.6% |
| 1987 | 1.76 million 1000 SLC | +16.2% |
| 1988 | 1.30 million 1000 SLC | -26.1% |
| 1989 | 1.42 million 1000 SLC | +9.4% |
| 1990 | 1.38 million 1000 SLC | -2.7% |
| 1991 | 1.39 million 1000 SLC | +0.5% |
| 1992 | 1.38 million 1000 SLC | -0.8% |
| 1993 | 1.33 million 1000 SLC | -3.7% |
| 1994 | 1.13 million 1000 SLC | -15.0% |
| 1995 | 1.34 million 1000 SLC | +18.4% |
| 1996 | 1.14 million 1000 SLC | -15.1% |
| 1997 | 1.17 million 1000 SLC | +2.9% |
| 1998 | 1.13 million 1000 SLC | -3.7% |
| 1999 | 1.07 million 1000 SLC | -5.3% |
| 2000 | 1.01 million 1000 SLC | -5.0% |
| 2001 | 1.01 million 1000 SLC | -0.0% |
| 2002 | 918,855 1000 SLC | -9.2% |
| 2003 | 637,675 1000 SLC | -30.6% |
| 2004 | 675,999 1000 SLC | +6.0% |
| 2005 | 869,701 1000 SLC | +28.7% |
| 2006 | 700,243 1000 SLC | -19.5% |
| 2007 | 673,583 1000 SLC | -3.8% |
| 2008 | 609,765 1000 SLC | -9.5% |
| 2009 | 572,941 1000 SLC | -6.0% |
| 2010 | 588,521 1000 SLC | +2.7% |
| 2011 | 677,332 1000 SLC | +15.1% |
| 2012 | 682,497 1000 SLC | +0.8% |
| 2013 | 807,799 1000 SLC | +18.4% |
| 2014 | 781,502 1000 SLC | -3.3% |
| 2015 | 783,780 1000 SLC | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 909,304 1000 SLC | +16.0% |
| 2017 | 913,850 1000 SLC | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 939,017 1000 SLC | +2.8% |
| 2019 | 889,362 1000 SLC | -5.3% |
| 2020 | 940,183 1000 SLC | +5.7% |
| 2021 | 921,854 1000 SLC | -1.9% |
| 2022 | 1.02 million 1000 SLC | +10.2% |
| 2023 | 998,054 1000 SLC | -1.8% |
| 2024 | 828,128 1000 SLC | -17.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.43 million 1000 SLC | 1.33 million 1000 SLC | 1.58 million 1000 SLC | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.94 million 1000 SLC | 1.75 million 1000 SLC | 2.25 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.08 million 1000 SLC | 1.30 million 1000 SLC | 2.92 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.25 million 1000 SLC | 1.07 million 1000 SLC | 1.39 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2000s | 768,342 1000 SLC | 572,941 1000 SLC | 1.01 million 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2010s | 797,296 1000 SLC | 588,521 1000 SLC | 939,017 1000 SLC | 10 |
| 2020s | 940,860 1000 SLC | 828,128 1000 SLC | 1.02 million 1000 SLC | 5 |
Countries ranked near Nepal
More agriculture & rural data for Nepal
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 4.5 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.2156 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 331.1 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.7937 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0002 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.33 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 21.56 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 21.56 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.6% (2022)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is chick peas, dry — gross production value in Nepal?
- Chick peas, dry — gross production value in Nepal was 828,128 1000 SLC in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest chick peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Nepal?
- The highest recorded value was 2.92 million 1000 SLC in 1982.
- What is the lowest chick peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Nepal?
- The lowest recorded value was 572,941 1000 SLC in 2009.
- How does Nepal rank for chick peas, dry — gross production value?
- Nepal ranks 12th out of 40 countries with data for 2024.
- Is chick peas, dry — gross production value rising or falling in Nepal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Nepal data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.