Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Myanmar
Myanmar: Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value was 292,097 1000 Int$ in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
292,097 1000 Int$
Change on year
up 1.8%
World rank
5th
of 55 countries
All-time high
398,199 1000 Int$
in 2015
All-time low
24,957 1000 Int$
in 1961
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Myanmar, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
Myanmar recorded 292,097 1000 Int$ for chick peas, dry — gross production value in 2024.
That represents a change of up 1.8% on the previous year and down 26.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, chick peas, dry — gross production value in Myanmar peaked at 398,199 1000 Int$ in 2015 and was at its lowest, 24,957 1000 Int$, in 1961.
That places Myanmar 5th out of 55 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value in Myanmar, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 24,957 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 32,030 1000 Int$ | +28.3% |
| 1963 | 50,524 1000 Int$ | +57.7% |
| 1964 | 54,115 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1965 | 38,270 1000 Int$ | -29.3% |
| 1966 | 34,299 1000 Int$ | -10.4% |
| 1967 | 30,545 1000 Int$ | -10.9% |
| 1968 | 36,695 1000 Int$ | +20.1% |
| 1969 | 56,535 1000 Int$ | +54.1% |
| 1970 | 42,546 1000 Int$ | -24.7% |
| 1971 | 49,524 1000 Int$ | +16.4% |
| 1972 | 63,269 1000 Int$ | +27.8% |
| 1973 | 42,687 1000 Int$ | -32.5% |
| 1974 | 38,440 1000 Int$ | -9.9% |
| 1975 | 46,696 1000 Int$ | +21.5% |
| 1976 | 47,580 1000 Int$ | +1.9% |
| 1977 | 65,889 1000 Int$ | +38.5% |
| 1978 | 70,476 1000 Int$ | +7.0% |
| 1979 | 66,434 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 1980 | 26,515 1000 Int$ | -60.1% |
| 1981 | 71,282 1000 Int$ | +168.8% |
| 1982 | 108,409 1000 Int$ | +52.1% |
| 1983 | 87,584 1000 Int$ | -19.2% |
| 1984 | 120,753 1000 Int$ | +37.9% |
| 1985 | 95,898 1000 Int$ | -20.6% |
| 1986 | 118,743 1000 Int$ | +23.8% |
| 1987 | 106,763 1000 Int$ | -10.1% |
| 1988 | 114,339 1000 Int$ | +7.1% |
| 1989 | 51,282 1000 Int$ | -55.1% |
| 1990 | 70,415 1000 Int$ | +37.3% |
| 1991 | 76,504 1000 Int$ | +8.6% |
| 1992 | 68,910 1000 Int$ | -9.9% |
| 1993 | 41,318 1000 Int$ | -40.0% |
| 1994 | 52,954 1000 Int$ | +28.2% |
| 1995 | 63,684 1000 Int$ | +20.3% |
| 1996 | 61,942 1000 Int$ | -2.7% |
| 1997 | 61,942 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 46,544 1000 Int$ | -24.9% |
| 1999 | 57,762 1000 Int$ | +24.1% |
| 2000 | 81,800 1000 Int$ | +41.6% |
| 2001 | 132,803 1000 Int$ | +62.4% |
| 2002 | 145,275 1000 Int$ | +9.4% |
| 2003 | 156,284 1000 Int$ | +7.6% |
| 2004 | 163,878 1000 Int$ | +4.9% |
| 2005 | 181,367 1000 Int$ | +10.7% |
| 2006 | 229,722 1000 Int$ | +26.7% |
| 2007 | 242,403 1000 Int$ | +5.5% |
| 2008 | 277,032 1000 Int$ | +14.3% |
| 2009 | 302,673 1000 Int$ | +9.3% |
| 2010 | 320,092 1000 Int$ | +5.8% |
| 2011 | 324,412 1000 Int$ | +1.3% |
| 2012 | 360,295 1000 Int$ | +11.1% |
| 2013 | 391,719 1000 Int$ | +8.7% |
| 2014 | 397,642 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2015 | 398,199 1000 Int$ | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 389,761 1000 Int$ | -2.1% |
| 2017 | 367,030 1000 Int$ | -5.8% |
| 2018 | 372,490 1000 Int$ | +1.5% |
| 2019 | 347,989 1000 Int$ | -6.6% |
| 2020 | 335,829 1000 Int$ | -3.5% |
| 2021 | 322,342 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 2022 | 303,009 1000 Int$ | -6.0% |
| 2023 | 287,045 1000 Int$ | -5.3% |
| 2024 | 292,097 1000 Int$ | +1.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 39,774 1000 Int$ | 24,957 1000 Int$ | 56,535 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 53,354 1000 Int$ | 38,440 1000 Int$ | 70,476 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 90,157 1000 Int$ | 26,515 1000 Int$ | 120,753 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 60,198 1000 Int$ | 41,318 1000 Int$ | 76,504 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 191,324 1000 Int$ | 81,800 1000 Int$ | 302,673 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 366,963 1000 Int$ | 320,092 1000 Int$ | 398,199 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 308,064 1000 Int$ | 287,045 1000 Int$ | 335,829 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Myanmar
More agriculture & rural data for Myanmar
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.26 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.253 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 376.69 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4495 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0005 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.6942 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 25.3 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 25.3 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.5% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is chick peas, dry — gross production value in Myanmar?
- Chick peas, dry — gross production value in Myanmar was 292,097 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest chick peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Myanmar?
- The highest recorded value was 398,199 1000 Int$ in 2015.
- What is the lowest chick peas, dry — gross production value recorded in Myanmar?
- The lowest recorded value was 24,957 1000 Int$ in 1961.
- How does Myanmar rank for chick peas, dry — gross production value?
- Myanmar ranks 5th out of 55 countries with data for 2024.
- Is chick peas, dry — gross production value rising or falling in Myanmar?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Myanmar data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Chick peas, dry — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.