Cauliflowers and broccoli — Gross Production Value in Iceland
Iceland: Cauliflowers and broccoli — Gross Production Value was 41 1000 Int$ in 2024. ▲ Rising
Latest (2024)
41 1000 Int$
Change on year
down 29.3%
World rank
93rd
of 97 countries
All-time high
64 1000 Int$
in 2012
All-time low
13 1000 Int$
in 1975
Years of data
64
1961–2024
Cauliflowers and broccoli — Gross Production Value in Iceland, 1961–2024
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 Int$.
Analysis
In 2024, cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value in Iceland stood at 41 1000 Int$.
The figure is down 29.3% on the previous year and up 95.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value in Iceland peaked at 64 1000 Int$ in 2012 and was at its lowest, 13 1000 Int$, in 1975.
Iceland ranks 93rd of 97 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Cauliflowers and broccoli — Gross Production Value in Iceland, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 31 1000 Int$ | — |
| 1962 | 38 1000 Int$ | +22.6% |
| 1963 | 38 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 43 1000 Int$ | +13.2% |
| 1965 | 43 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 43 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 43 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1968 | 43 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1969 | 43 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 43 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 16 1000 Int$ | -62.8% |
| 1972 | 43 1000 Int$ | +168.8% |
| 1973 | 36 1000 Int$ | -16.3% |
| 1974 | 23 1000 Int$ | -36.1% |
| 1975 | 13 1000 Int$ | -43.5% |
| 1976 | 20 1000 Int$ | +53.8% |
| 1977 | 23 1000 Int$ | +15.0% |
| 1978 | 36 1000 Int$ | +56.5% |
| 1979 | 28 1000 Int$ | -22.2% |
| 1980 | 47 1000 Int$ | +67.9% |
| 1981 | 58 1000 Int$ | +23.4% |
| 1982 | 48 1000 Int$ | -17.2% |
| 1983 | 45 1000 Int$ | -6.2% |
| 1984 | 49 1000 Int$ | +8.9% |
| 1985 | 53 1000 Int$ | +8.2% |
| 1986 | 43 1000 Int$ | -18.9% |
| 1987 | 45 1000 Int$ | +4.7% |
| 1988 | 45 1000 Int$ | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 34 1000 Int$ | -24.4% |
| 1990 | 41 1000 Int$ | +20.6% |
| 1991 | 53 1000 Int$ | +29.3% |
| 1992 | 47 1000 Int$ | -11.3% |
| 1993 | 42 1000 Int$ | -10.6% |
| 1994 | 44 1000 Int$ | +4.8% |
| 1995 | 62 1000 Int$ | +40.9% |
| 1996 | 55 1000 Int$ | -11.3% |
| 1997 | 43 1000 Int$ | -21.8% |
| 1998 | 53 1000 Int$ | +23.3% |
| 1999 | 46 1000 Int$ | -13.2% |
| 2000 | 42 1000 Int$ | -8.7% |
| 2001 | 39 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 2002 | 38 1000 Int$ | -2.6% |
| 2003 | 33 1000 Int$ | -13.2% |
| 2004 | 39 1000 Int$ | +18.2% |
| 2005 | 21 1000 Int$ | -46.2% |
| 2006 | 39 1000 Int$ | +85.7% |
| 2007 | 53 1000 Int$ | +35.9% |
| 2008 | 50 1000 Int$ | -5.7% |
| 2009 | 48 1000 Int$ | -4.0% |
| 2010 | 51 1000 Int$ | +6.2% |
| 2011 | 49 1000 Int$ | -3.9% |
| 2012 | 64 1000 Int$ | +30.6% |
| 2013 | 24 1000 Int$ | -62.5% |
| 2014 | 21 1000 Int$ | -12.5% |
| 2015 | 23 1000 Int$ | +9.5% |
| 2016 | 28 1000 Int$ | +21.7% |
| 2017 | 26 1000 Int$ | -7.1% |
| 2018 | 22 1000 Int$ | -15.4% |
| 2019 | 36 1000 Int$ | +63.6% |
| 2020 | 42 1000 Int$ | +16.7% |
| 2021 | 49 1000 Int$ | +16.7% |
| 2022 | 42 1000 Int$ | -14.3% |
| 2023 | 58 1000 Int$ | +38.1% |
| 2024 | 41 1000 Int$ | -29.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 40.56 1000 Int$ | 31 1000 Int$ | 43 1000 Int$ | 9 |
| 1970s | 28.1 1000 Int$ | 13 1000 Int$ | 43 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 46.7 1000 Int$ | 34 1000 Int$ | 58 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 48.6 1000 Int$ | 41 1000 Int$ | 62 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 40.2 1000 Int$ | 21 1000 Int$ | 53 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 34.4 1000 Int$ | 21 1000 Int$ | 64 1000 Int$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 46.4 1000 Int$ | 41 1000 Int$ | 58 1000 Int$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Iceland
- 90 Madagascar 129 1000 Int$ compare
- 91 Zimbabwe 128 1000 Int$ compare
- 92 Estonia 75 1000 Int$ compare
- 94 Republic of Korea 40 1000 Int$ compare
- 95 Grenada 22 1000 Int$ compare
- 96 Luxembourg 2 1000 Int$ compare
More agriculture & rural data for Iceland
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 19.96 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0365 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 3,593 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.8983 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.0578 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value in Iceland?
- Cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value in Iceland was 41 1000 Int$ in 2024, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value recorded in Iceland?
- The highest recorded value was 64 1000 Int$ in 2012.
- What is the lowest cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value recorded in Iceland?
- The lowest recorded value was 13 1000 Int$ in 1975.
- How does Iceland rank for cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value?
- Iceland ranks 93rd out of 97 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cauliflowers and broccoli — gross production value rising or falling in Iceland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 95.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Iceland data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Cauliflowers and broccoli — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The domain provides detailed data on the value of agricultural production that is calculated by the agricultural production data and the price data at farm gate. Thus, the value of production measures the agricultural production in monetary terms at the farm gate level.