Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre was 0.0622 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising

Latest (2023)
0.0622 t per square kilometre
Change on year
down 3.2%
World rank
28th
of 167 countries
All-time high
0.0701 t per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
0.0188 t per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023

0.020.040.060.08196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica stood at 0.0622 t per square kilometre.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.2% on the previous year and up 1.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 0.0701 t per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.0188 t per square kilometre, in 1962.

That places Costa Rica 28th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961 to 2023.
Year t per square kilometre Change
1961 0.0216 t per square kilometre
1962 0.0188 t per square kilometre -12.7%
1963 0.0245 t per square kilometre +29.8%
1964 0.025 t per square kilometre +2.4%
1965 0.0232 t per square kilometre -7.2%
1966 0.0189 t per square kilometre -18.7%
1967 0.0225 t per square kilometre +19.0%
1968 0.0274 t per square kilometre +21.7%
1969 0.0295 t per square kilometre +7.9%
1970 0.0321 t per square kilometre +8.6%
1971 0.035 t per square kilometre +9.0%
1972 0.0337 t per square kilometre -3.5%
1973 0.0374 t per square kilometre +10.8%
1974 0.0374 t per square kilometre +0.0%
1975 0.0479 t per square kilometre +28.1%
1976 0.0581 t per square kilometre +21.3%
1977 0.0578 t per square kilometre -0.5%
1978 0.0545 t per square kilometre -5.8%
1979 0.0601 t per square kilometre +10.4%
1980 0.055 t per square kilometre -8.5%
1981 0.0576 t per square kilometre +4.6%
1982 0.0475 t per square kilometre -17.5%
1983 0.0482 t per square kilometre +1.5%
1984 0.0552 t per square kilometre +14.6%
1985 0.0673 t per square kilometre +21.8%
1986 0.0662 t per square kilometre -1.6%
1987 0.0698 t per square kilometre +5.4%
1988 0.0619 t per square kilometre -11.3%
1989 0.0615 t per square kilometre -0.6%
1990 0.0629 t per square kilometre +2.3%
1991 0.0676 t per square kilometre +7.4%
1992 0.0582 t per square kilometre -13.9%
1993 0.0589 t per square kilometre +1.2%
1994 0.0687 t per square kilometre +16.6%
1995 0.0673 t per square kilometre -2.0%
1996 0.0694 t per square kilometre +3.0%
1997 0.062 t per square kilometre -10.7%
1998 0.059 t per square kilometre -4.8%
1999 0.0608 t per square kilometre +2.9%
2000 0.0592 t per square kilometre -2.6%
2001 0.0535 t per square kilometre -9.6%
2002 0.0491 t per square kilometre -8.1%
2003 0.0533 t per square kilometre +8.5%
2004 0.0504 t per square kilometre -5.5%
2005 0.0581 t per square kilometre +15.3%
2006 0.0542 t per square kilometre -6.7%
2007 0.0582 t per square kilometre +7.3%
2008 0.063 t per square kilometre +8.3%
2009 0.0681 t per square kilometre +8.1%
2010 0.0701 t per square kilometre +3.1%
2011 0.0691 t per square kilometre -1.5%
2012 0.063 t per square kilometre -8.8%
2013 0.0612 t per square kilometre -2.8%
2014 0.0635 t per square kilometre +3.7%
2015 0.059 t per square kilometre -7.0%
2016 0.0525 t per square kilometre -11.0%
2017 0.0561 t per square kilometre +6.9%
2018 0.0584 t per square kilometre +4.1%
2019 0.0637 t per square kilometre +9.1%
2020 0.0646 t per square kilometre +1.3%
2021 0.0672 t per square kilometre +4.1%
2022 0.0643 t per square kilometre -4.3%
2023 0.0622 t per square kilometre -3.2%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0.0235 t per square kilometre 0.0188 t per square kilometre 0.0295 t per square kilometre 9
1970s 0.0454 t per square kilometre 0.0321 t per square kilometre 0.0601 t per square kilometre 10
1980s 0.059 t per square kilometre 0.0475 t per square kilometre 0.0698 t per square kilometre 10
1990s 0.0635 t per square kilometre 0.0582 t per square kilometre 0.0694 t per square kilometre 10
2000s 0.0567 t per square kilometre 0.0491 t per square kilometre 0.0681 t per square kilometre 10
2010s 0.0617 t per square kilometre 0.0525 t per square kilometre 0.0701 t per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.0646 t per square kilometre 0.0622 t per square kilometre 0.0672 t per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 25 Uzbekistan 0.0759 t per square kilometre compare
  2. 26 Tajikistan 0.0725 t per square kilometre compare
  3. 27 Armenia 0.0688 t per square kilometre compare
  4. 29 Ecuador 0.061 t per square kilometre compare
  5. 30 Panama 0.0593 t per square kilometre compare
  6. 31 Italy 0.0591 t per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 168 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
Cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 0.0622 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 0.0701 t per square kilometre in 2010.
What is the lowest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0188 t per square kilometre in 1962.
How does Costa Rica rank for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 28th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
Is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/cattle-fat-unrendered-production-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/">Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,398 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.