Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Congo
Congo: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Congo, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Congo recorded 0.0003 t per square kilometre for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in 2023.
That represents a change of down 0.9% on the previous year and down 11.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Congo peaked at 0.0004 t per square kilometre in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 t per square kilometre, in 1961.
That places Congo 161st out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Congo, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 t per square kilometre | +35.4% |
| 1963 | 0 t per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1964 | 0 t per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1965 | 0 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 1966 | 0 t per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 1967 | 0 t per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +16.7% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -5.1% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -12.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | +33.3% |
| 2006 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 2008 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2017 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 2019 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2021 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -0.3% |
| 2022 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | -0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 t per square kilometre | 0 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0002 t per square kilometre | 0.0001 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0004 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 0.0003 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Congo
- 158 Seychelles 0.0005 t per square kilometre compare
- 159 Suriname 0.0004 t per square kilometre compare
- 160 Guyana 0.0003 t per square kilometre compare
- 162 Papua New Guinea 0.0002 t per square kilometre compare
- 163 Liberia 0.0002 t per square kilometre compare
- 164 Gabon 0.0001 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Congo
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 11.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1011 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 254.21 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.72 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3588 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 10.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 10.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 2.4% (2023)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Congo?
- Cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Congo was 0.0003 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0004 t per square kilometre in 2012.
- What is the lowest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Congo rank for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
- Congo ranks 161st out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is down 11.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Cattle fat, unrendered — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.