Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre was 0.0082 t per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
Chile recorded 0.0082 t per square kilometre for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.7% on the previous year and down 9.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 0.0115 t per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0.0039 t per square kilometre, in 1973.
That places Chile 107th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0065 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0069 t per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 1963 | 0.007 t per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1964 | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1965 | 0.006 t per square kilometre | +3.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0067 t per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0069 t per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 1968 | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0073 t per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1970 | 0.0077 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0067 t per square kilometre | -13.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0052 t per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1973 | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | -24.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0077 t per square kilometre | +96.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0095 t per square kilometre | +23.0% |
| 1976 | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1978 | 0.0072 t per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1979 | 0.0074 t per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1980 | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0081 t per square kilometre | +13.8% |
| 1982 | 0.0085 t per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1983 | 0.0091 t per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0086 t per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 1985 | 0.0077 t per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1986 | 0.0078 t per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 1987 | 0.0077 t per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1988 | 0.0086 t per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1989 | 0.0097 t per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0106 t per square kilometre | +9.5% |
| 1991 | 0.0101 t per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1992 | 0.0088 t per square kilometre | -13.0% |
| 1993 | 0.0098 t per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0105 t per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0113 t per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1996 | 0.0114 t per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1997 | 0.0115 t per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0113 t per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 1999 | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0096 t per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0088 t per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0091 t per square kilometre | +8.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0095 t per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2006 | 0.0104 t per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2007 | 0.0106 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0106 t per square kilometre | -0.6% |
| 2009 | 0.0092 t per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0093 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0091 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | +9.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2016 | 0.0095 t per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0089 t per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0.0088 t per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0092 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0098 t per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0092 t per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2023 | 0.0082 t per square kilometre | -1.7% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1974 | +96.5% | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | 0.0077 t per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0067 t per square kilometre | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | 0.0076 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0072 t per square kilometre | 0.0039 t per square kilometre | 0.0095 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0083 t per square kilometre | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | 0.0097 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0105 t per square kilometre | 0.0088 t per square kilometre | 0.0115 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0096 t per square kilometre | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | 0.0106 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0091 t per square kilometre | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | 0.0099 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0089 t per square kilometre | 0.0082 t per square kilometre | 0.0098 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 104 Nepal 0.0086 t per square kilometre compare
- 105 Georgia 0.0086 t per square kilometre compare
- 106 Sao Tome and Principe 0.0084 t per square kilometre compare
- 108 Eritrea 0.0081 t per square kilometre compare
- 109 Peru 0.0081 t per square kilometre compare
- 110 Bulgaria 0.0077 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Chile?
- Cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Chile was 0.0082 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0115 t per square kilometre in 1997.
- What is the lowest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0039 t per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Chile rank for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 107th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Cattle fat, unrendered — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.