Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Brazil
Brazil: Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre was 0.035 t per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Brazil, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Brazil is 0.035 t per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 11.9% on the previous year and up 9.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Brazil peaked at 0.038 t per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, 0.0053 t per square kilometre, in 1962.
Brazil ranks 45th of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre in Brazil, year by year
| Year | t per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0053 t per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0053 t per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1963 | 0.0053 t per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0056 t per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1965 | 0.0058 t per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1966 | 0.0057 t per square kilometre | -3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0059 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1968 | 0.0066 t per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 1969 | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1970 | 0.0072 t per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1971 | 0.007 t per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1972 | 0.0082 t per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0086 t per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0079 t per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1975 | 0.0084 t per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1976 | 0.0093 t per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0096 t per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1978 | 0.01 t per square kilometre | +5.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0104 t per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1980 | 0.0111 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 1981 | 0.0117 t per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0119 t per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1983 | 0.0127 t per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1984 | 0.0134 t per square kilometre | +5.2% |
| 1985 | 0.0136 t per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1986 | 0.0141 t per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0144 t per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0158 t per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 1989 | 0.0165 t per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0161 t per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1991 | 0.0176 t per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0184 t per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1993 | 0.0188 t per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1994 | 0.0201 t per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1995 | 0.0223 t per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 1996 | 0.0242 t per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1997 | 0.0231 t per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1998 | 0.0226 t per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1999 | 0.0251 t per square kilometre | +10.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0257 t per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 0.0267 t per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0279 t per square kilometre | +4.6% |
| 2003 | 0.0282 t per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2004 | 0.0304 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0248 t per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 2006 | 0.0269 t per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2007 | 0.0275 t per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2008 | 0.0259 t per square kilometre | -6.1% |
| 2009 | 0.026 t per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0273 t per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0265 t per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 2012 | 0.0287 t per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0319 t per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 2014 | 0.038 t per square kilometre | +19.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0315 t per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0287 t per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2017 | 0.03 t per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0312 t per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0321 t per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0306 t per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0291 t per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0313 t per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2023 | 0.035 t per square kilometre | +11.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0059 t per square kilometre | 0.0053 t per square kilometre | 0.0071 t per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0087 t per square kilometre | 0.007 t per square kilometre | 0.0104 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0135 t per square kilometre | 0.0111 t per square kilometre | 0.0165 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0208 t per square kilometre | 0.0161 t per square kilometre | 0.0251 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.027 t per square kilometre | 0.0248 t per square kilometre | 0.0304 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0306 t per square kilometre | 0.0265 t per square kilometre | 0.038 t per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0315 t per square kilometre | 0.0291 t per square kilometre | 0.035 t per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
- 42 Dominican Republic 0.0355 t per square kilometre compare
- 43 China 0.0353 t per square kilometre compare
- 44 Bahrain 0.0353 t per square kilometre compare
- 46 Serbia 0.0347 t per square kilometre compare
- 47 Paraguay 0.0328 t per square kilometre compare
- 48 El Salvador 0.0328 t per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Brazil
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0609 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 652.04 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.95 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1182 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 6.1% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 6.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 5.2% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.8% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Brazil?
- Cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre in Brazil was 0.035 t per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 0.038 t per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0053 t per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Brazil rank for cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 45th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cattle fat, unrendered — production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cattle fat, unrendered — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Cattle fat, unrendered — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cattle fat, unrendered — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.