Capture fishery production, per square kilometre in Burundi
Burundi: Capture fishery production, per square kilometre was 0.7342 metric tons per square kilometre in 2024. ▲ Rising
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre in Burundi, 1961–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in metric tons per square kilometre.
Analysis
Burundi recorded 0.7342 metric tons per square kilometre for capture fishery production, per square kilometre in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.3% on the previous year and up 17.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, capture fishery production, per square kilometre in Burundi peaked at 0.9374 metric tons per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0.1184 metric tons per square kilometre, in 1996.
Burundi ranks 99th of 215 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 64 years of available data.
Capture fishery production, per square kilometre in Burundi, year by year
| Year | metric tons per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2064 metric tons per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2804 metric tons per square kilometre | +35.8% |
| 1963 | 0.4128 metric tons per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 1964 | 0.3777 metric tons per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1965 | 0.7866 metric tons per square kilometre | +108.2% |
| 1966 | 0.6464 metric tons per square kilometre | -17.8% |
| 1967 | 0.479 metric tons per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 1968 | 0.5841 metric tons per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 1969 | 0.6075 metric tons per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1970 | 0.5179 metric tons per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 1971 | 0.6581 metric tons per square kilometre | +27.1% |
| 1972 | 0.2921 metric tons per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1973 | 0.331 metric tons per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 1974 | 0.4276 metric tons per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 1975 | 0.5665 metric tons per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1976 | 0.7918 metric tons per square kilometre | +39.8% |
| 1977 | 0.736 metric tons per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 1978 | 0.6107 metric tons per square kilometre | -17.0% |
| 1979 | 0.4381 metric tons per square kilometre | -28.3% |
| 1980 | 0.575 metric tons per square kilometre | +31.3% |
| 1981 | 0.4626 metric tons per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1982 | 0.4724 metric tons per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1983 | 0.4426 metric tons per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1984 | 0.4424 metric tons per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 1985 | 0.4427 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 1986 | 0.4611 metric tons per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 1987 | 0.4676 metric tons per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1988 | 0.4547 metric tons per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1989 | 0.4191 metric tons per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 1990 | 0.6774 metric tons per square kilometre | +61.6% |
| 1991 | 0.8175 metric tons per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1992 | 0.9374 metric tons per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1993 | 0.662 metric tons per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 1994 | 0.8567 metric tons per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 1995 | 0.8217 metric tons per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1996 | 0.1184 metric tons per square kilometre | -85.6% |
| 1997 | 0.7903 metric tons per square kilometre | +567.4% |
| 1998 | 0.5228 metric tons per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 1999 | 0.3582 metric tons per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2000 | 0.6743 metric tons per square kilometre | +88.2% |
| 2001 | 0.3491 metric tons per square kilometre | -48.2% |
| 2002 | 0.4283 metric tons per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 2003 | 0.5723 metric tons per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 2004 | 0.5395 metric tons per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2005 | 0.5218 metric tons per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2006 | 0.5054 metric tons per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 2007 | 0.4404 metric tons per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2008 | 0.7113 metric tons per square kilometre | +61.5% |
| 2009 | 0.4912 metric tons per square kilometre | -30.9% |
| 2010 | 0.6739 metric tons per square kilometre | +37.2% |
| 2011 | 0.4149 metric tons per square kilometre | -38.4% |
| 2012 | 0.4793 metric tons per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2013 | 0.5153 metric tons per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2014 | 0.6252 metric tons per square kilometre | +21.3% |
| 2015 | 0.7835 metric tons per square kilometre | +25.3% |
| 2016 | 0.8491 metric tons per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 2017 | 0.7398 metric tons per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2018 | 0.7909 metric tons per square kilometre | +6.9% |
| 2019 | 0.7933 metric tons per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.7628 metric tons per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2021 | 0.7613 metric tons per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2022 | 0.7763 metric tons per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.7671 metric tons per square kilometre | -1.2% |
| 2024 | 0.7342 metric tons per square kilometre | -4.3% |
Burundi compared with similar countries
- Burundi's 0.7342 metric tons per square kilometre is above the median for low income countries, which is 0.2272 metric tons per square kilometre, 3.2× the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Burundi's 0.7342 metric tons per square kilometre is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.4019 metric tons per square kilometre, 1.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Capture fishery production, per square kilometre in Burundi changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1997 | +567.4% | 0.1184 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7903 metric tons per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4868 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.2064 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7866 metric tons per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.537 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.2921 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7918 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.464 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.4191 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.575 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6562 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.1184 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.9374 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.5234 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.3491 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7113 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6665 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.4149 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.8491 metric tons per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.7604 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7342 metric tons per square kilometre | 0.7763 metric tons per square kilometre | 5 |
Countries ranked near Burundi
- 96 Azerbaijan 0.7746 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 97 Croatia 0.7658 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 98 Papua New Guinea 0.757 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 100 Pakistan 0.6963 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 101 Costa Rica 0.6357 metric tons per square kilometre compare
- 102 Mozambique 0.6304 metric tons per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Burundi
- Cropland extent over the long-term, annual growth rate 1.55 % change on previous year (2025)
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per unit of GDP 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Cropland extent over the long-term, per capita 0.1198 hectares per person (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, annual growth rate 1.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per unit of GDP 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agricultural area over the long-term, per capita 0.1534 hectares per person (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 8.36 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.3429 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 80.18 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 1.27 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is capture fishery production, per square kilometre in Burundi?
- Capture fishery production, per square kilometre in Burundi was 0.7342 metric tons per square kilometre in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest capture fishery production, per square kilometre recorded in Burundi?
- The highest recorded value was 0.9374 metric tons per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest capture fishery production, per square kilometre recorded in Burundi?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1184 metric tons per square kilometre in 1996.
- How does Burundi rank for capture fishery production, per square kilometre?
- Burundi ranks 99th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is capture fishery production, per square kilometre rising or falling in Burundi?
- Over the last ten years it is up 17.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Burundi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Capture fishery production, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Capture fishery production ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Capture fishery production Our World in Data
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Capture fishery production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.