Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate in Chile
Chile: Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate was 1.4 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
1.4 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 559.8%
World rank
45th
of 148 countries
All-time high
54.41 % change on previous year
in 1989
All-time low
-31.82 % change on previous year
in 1984
Years of data
63
1962–2024
Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate in Chile, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, cabbages — yield, annual growth rate in Chile stood at 1.4 % change on previous year.
That represents a change of up 559.8% on the previous year and up 513.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — yield, annual growth rate in Chile peaked at 54.41 % change on previous year in 1989 and was at its lowest, -31.82 % change on previous year, in 1984.
Chile ranks 45th of 148 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate in Chile, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 2.7 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 2.63 % change on previous year | -2.6% |
| 1964 | 2.56 % change on previous year | -2.6% |
| 1965 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1966 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1975 | 2 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | -1.38 % change on previous year | -169.2% |
| 1977 | -1.21 % change on previous year | -12.9% |
| 1978 | -4.07 % change on previous year | +237.2% |
| 1979 | 9.09 % change on previous year | -323.5% |
| 1980 | -5.45 % change on previous year | -159.9% |
| 1981 | 3 % change on previous year | -155.1% |
| 1982 | -7.97 % change on previous year | -365.4% |
| 1983 | 7.28 % change on previous year | -191.4% |
| 1984 | -31.82 % change on previous year | -537.1% |
| 1985 | 32 % change on previous year | -200.6% |
| 1986 | 11.11 % change on previous year | -65.3% |
| 1987 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1988 | -2.86 % change on previous year | — |
| 1989 | 54.41 % change on previous year | -2005.4% |
| 1990 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1991 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1992 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1993 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1995 | -16.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1996 | 8 % change on previous year | -148.0% |
| 1997 | 0.3715 % change on previous year | -95.4% |
| 1998 | -0.3731 % change on previous year | -200.4% |
| 1999 | 0.3537 % change on previous year | -194.8% |
| 2000 | 0.2015 % change on previous year | -43.0% |
| 2001 | 1.5 % change on previous year | +642.6% |
| 2002 | 1.45 % change on previous year | -3.3% |
| 2003 | -1.4 % change on previous year | -196.6% |
| 2004 | 0.5939 % change on previous year | -142.5% |
| 2005 | -0.6192 % change on previous year | -204.3% |
| 2006 | -0.5962 % change on previous year | -3.7% |
| 2007 | -0.3684 % change on previous year | -38.2% |
| 2008 | -2.73 % change on previous year | +642.3% |
| 2009 | -4.31 % change on previous year | +57.7% |
| 2010 | -1.19 % change on previous year | -72.4% |
| 2011 | 1.96 % change on previous year | -264.7% |
| 2012 | -3 % change on previous year | -253.1% |
| 2013 | 2.17 % change on previous year | -172.4% |
| 2014 | -0.3387 % change on previous year | -115.6% |
| 2015 | -0.2299 % change on previous year | -32.1% |
| 2016 | 2.18 % change on previous year | -1046.2% |
| 2017 | 0.5647 % change on previous year | -74.0% |
| 2018 | 0.5469 % change on previous year | -3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.6291 % change on previous year | +15.0% |
| 2020 | 0.2529 % change on previous year | -59.8% |
| 2021 | 1.79 % change on previous year | +609.1% |
| 2022 | -0.7203 % change on previous year | -140.2% |
| 2023 | 0.2123 % change on previous year | -129.5% |
| 2024 | 1.4 % change on previous year | +559.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9873 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 2.7 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.4434 % change on previous year | -4.07 % change on previous year | 9.09 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.97 % change on previous year | -31.82 % change on previous year | 54.41 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.8315 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 8 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.629 % change on previous year | -4.31 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3289 % change on previous year | -3 % change on previous year | 2.18 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5878 % change on previous year | -0.7203 % change on previous year | 1.79 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 42 Russian Federation 1.7 % change on previous year compare
- 43 Iraq 1.67 % change on previous year compare
- 44 India 1.62 % change on previous year compare
- 46 Slovakia 1.37 % change on previous year compare
- 47 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.33 % change on previous year compare
- 48 China, Taiwan Province of 1.31 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 3.45 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 3.45 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — yield, annual growth rate in Chile?
- Cabbages — yield, annual growth rate in Chile was 1.4 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — yield, annual growth rate recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 54.41 % change on previous year in 1989.
- What is the lowest cabbages — yield, annual growth rate recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was -31.82 % change on previous year in 1984.
- How does Chile rank for cabbages — yield, annual growth rate?
- Chile ranks 45th out of 148 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cabbages — yield, annual growth rate rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 513.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Yield, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cabbages — Yield. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cabbages — Yield Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cabbages — Yield. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.