Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Belgium
Belgium: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2017. ▼ Falling
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Belgium, 2000–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Belgium is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, measured in 2017.
The figure is up 26.3% on the previous year and up 10.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Belgium peaked at 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, in 2015.
That places Belgium 73rd out of 129 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 18 years of available data.
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Belgium, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2001 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -23.3% |
| 2002 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2003 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 2004 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -19.7% |
| 2005 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 2006 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -1.9% |
| 2007 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2008 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 2009 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2010 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2011 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 2012 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +4.0% |
| 2013 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 2014 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -15.6% |
| 2015 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | -36.1% |
| 2016 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +81.7% |
| 2017 | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | +26.3% |
Belgium compared with similar countries
- Belgium's 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP is above the median for high income countries, which is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, 2.4× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Belgium's 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP, 48% of the median. (43 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Belgium changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | +81.7% | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP | 8 |
Countries ranked near Belgium
More agriculture & rural data for Belgium
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -0.3325 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0073 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 443.58 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.2138 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1233 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.2% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.0% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Belgium?
- Cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Belgium was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Belgium?
- The highest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2000.
- What is the lowest cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Belgium?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 Int$ per US$ of GDP in 2015.
- How does Belgium rank for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Belgium ranks 73rd out of 129 countries with data for 2017.
- Is cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Belgium?
- Over the last ten years it is up 10.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belgium data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 18 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Cabbages — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.