Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Ecuador
Ecuador: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Ecuador stood at 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% on the previous year and down 9.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Ecuador peaked at 0.1074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1962 and was at its lowest, 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, in 1991.
Ecuador ranks 102nd of 129 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.1074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +89.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0865 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -19.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 1965 | 0.0715 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1966 | 0.0454 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -36.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0911 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +100.6% |
| 1968 | 0.0594 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1969 | 0.0764 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 1970 | 0.0641 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -16.1% |
| 1971 | 0.0668 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.3% |
| 1972 | 0.0506 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -24.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0378 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 1974 | 0.0337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 1975 | 0.0357 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1977 | 0.0356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -12.7% |
| 1978 | 0.0218 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 1980 | 0.0204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1981 | 0.0208 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1982 | 0.0188 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1983 | 0.0217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +15.6% |
| 1984 | 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1985 | 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -18.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -45.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1988 | 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -47.8% |
| 1990 | 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +4.4% |
| 1991 | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 1992 | 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +136.3% |
| 1993 | 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +28.9% |
| 1995 | 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +127.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +36.0% |
| 1998 | 0.017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +36.3% |
| 1999 | 0.024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +41.6% |
| 2000 | 0.0087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -63.8% |
| 2001 | 0.0081 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 2002 | 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2004 | 0.009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2005 | 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +11.2% |
| 2006 | 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0115 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2012 | 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -6.8% |
| 2016 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2019 | 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2020 | 0.011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 2021 | 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | -0.3% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.1119 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 10% of the median. (41 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, 33% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | +136.3% | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
| 1996 | +127.0% | 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0454 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.1074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0171 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0668 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0161 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0041 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.026 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0091 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0096 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0076 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 0.0112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 99 Algeria 0.0141 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 100 Belize 0.0133 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 101 Guyana 0.0127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 103 Sweden 0.0102 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 104 Luxembourg 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
- 105 Colombia 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Ecuador
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 10.59 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.097 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 691.36 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4287 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3661 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 9.7% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 9.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 3.9% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Ecuador?
- Cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Ecuador was 0.0111 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1074 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- What is the lowest cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- How does Ecuador rank for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Ecuador ranks 102nd out of 129 countries with data for 2023.
- Is cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 9.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Cabbages — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.