Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Latvia
Latvia: Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) was 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person in 2017. ▼ Falling
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Latvia, 1992–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 Int$ per person.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in 2017.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.6% on the previous year and up 45.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Latvia peaked at 0.0146 1000 Int$ per person in 1993 and was at its lowest, 0.0047 1000 Int$ per person, in 2000.
That places Latvia 6th out of 129 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 26 years of available data.
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) in Latvia, year by year
| Year | 1000 Int$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0.0131 1000 Int$ per person | — |
| 1993 | 0.0146 1000 Int$ per person | +12.2% |
| 1994 | 0.0117 1000 Int$ per person | -19.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0114 1000 Int$ per person | -2.5% |
| 1996 | 0.0063 1000 Int$ per person | -45.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0058 1000 Int$ per person | -7.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0049 1000 Int$ per person | -15.3% |
| 1999 | 0.0061 1000 Int$ per person | +23.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0047 1000 Int$ per person | -23.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0058 1000 Int$ per person | +24.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0059 1000 Int$ per person | +1.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0082 1000 Int$ per person | +39.1% |
| 2004 | 0.0074 1000 Int$ per person | -9.5% |
| 2005 | 0.0065 1000 Int$ per person | -12.0% |
| 2006 | 0.0065 1000 Int$ per person | -0.8% |
| 2007 | 0.0053 1000 Int$ per person | -17.9% |
| 2008 | 0.0056 1000 Int$ per person | +4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0066 1000 Int$ per person | +17.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0065 1000 Int$ per person | -0.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0068 1000 Int$ per person | +3.8% |
| 2012 | 0.007 1000 Int$ per person | +2.8% |
| 2013 | 0.006 1000 Int$ per person | -14.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0083 1000 Int$ per person | +39.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0093 1000 Int$ per person | +11.8% |
| 2016 | 0.0094 1000 Int$ per person | +1.3% |
| 2017 | 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person | -17.6% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person is above the median for high income countries, which is 0.0011 1000 Int$ per person, 7.3× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.0022 1000 Int$ per person, 3.6× the median. (43 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0092 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0049 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0146 1000 Int$ per person | 8 |
| 2000s | 0.0063 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0047 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0082 1000 Int$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0076 1000 Int$ per person | 0.006 1000 Int$ per person | 0.0094 1000 Int$ per person | 8 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More agriculture & rural data for Latvia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 12.21 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0401 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,055 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.3137 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 4.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 4.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 9.8% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 2.1% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Latvia?
- Cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) in Latvia was 0.0077 1000 Int$ per person in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0146 1000 Int$ per person in 1993.
- What is the lowest cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0047 1000 Int$ per person in 2000.
- How does Latvia rank for cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$)?
- Latvia ranks 6th out of 129 countries with data for 2017.
- Is cabbages — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$) rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 45.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Cabbages — Gross Production Value Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Cabbages — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.