Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Tunisia
Tunisia: Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate was -0.3656 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Tunisia, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Tunisia is -0.3656 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 1,099.6% on the previous year and down 111.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Tunisia peaked at 66.67 % change on previous year in 1997 and was at its lowest, -40 % change on previous year, in 1998.
Tunisia ranks 91st of 147 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 4.76 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | -27.27 % change on previous year | -672.7% |
| 1965 | 37.5 % change on previous year | -237.5% |
| 1966 | -9.09 % change on previous year | -124.2% |
| 1967 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 5 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 4.76 % change on previous year | -4.8% |
| 1972 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1973 | 4.55 % change on previous year | — |
| 1974 | 30.43 % change on previous year | +569.6% |
| 1975 | 16.67 % change on previous year | -45.2% |
| 1976 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1977 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1978 | 2.86 % change on previous year | — |
| 1979 | 2.78 % change on previous year | -2.8% |
| 1980 | 8.11 % change on previous year | +191.9% |
| 1981 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 2.5 % change on previous year | — |
| 1983 | 2.44 % change on previous year | -2.4% |
| 1984 | 16.67 % change on previous year | +583.3% |
| 1985 | -14.29 % change on previous year | -185.7% |
| 1986 | -4.76 % change on previous year | -66.7% |
| 1987 | 5 % change on previous year | -205.0% |
| 1988 | 2.38 % change on previous year | -52.4% |
| 1989 | 2.33 % change on previous year | -2.3% |
| 1990 | -2.27 % change on previous year | -197.7% |
| 1991 | 7.21 % change on previous year | -417.2% |
| 1992 | 19.31 % change on previous year | +167.8% |
| 1993 | 27.27 % change on previous year | +41.3% |
| 1994 | -14.29 % change on previous year | -152.4% |
| 1995 | 16.67 % change on previous year | -216.7% |
| 1996 | 11.43 % change on previous year | -31.4% |
| 1997 | 66.67 % change on previous year | +483.3% |
| 1998 | -40 % change on previous year | -160.0% |
| 1999 | 28.21 % change on previous year | -170.5% |
| 2000 | 10 % change on previous year | -64.5% |
| 2001 | 27.27 % change on previous year | +172.7% |
| 2002 | -14.29 % change on previous year | -152.4% |
| 2003 | -16.67 % change on previous year | +16.7% |
| 2004 | 60 % change on previous year | -460.0% |
| 2005 | 3.12 % change on previous year | -94.8% |
| 2006 | -0.5455 % change on previous year | -117.5% |
| 2007 | 21.88 % change on previous year | -4110.8% |
| 2008 | 10 % change on previous year | -54.3% |
| 2009 | -0.0909 % change on previous year | -100.9% |
| 2010 | 3.59 % change on previous year | -4053.6% |
| 2011 | -13.88 % change on previous year | -486.1% |
| 2012 | 19.84 % change on previous year | -242.9% |
| 2013 | 4.81 % change on previous year | -75.8% |
| 2014 | 3.13 % change on previous year | -35.0% |
| 2015 | 3.82 % change on previous year | +22.2% |
| 2016 | -3.41 % change on previous year | -189.4% |
| 2017 | 5.77 % change on previous year | -269.1% |
| 2018 | -2.52 % change on previous year | -143.7% |
| 2019 | 4.11 % change on previous year | -262.9% |
| 2020 | 1.02 % change on previous year | -75.1% |
| 2021 | -1.99 % change on previous year | -294.4% |
| 2022 | 0.9974 % change on previous year | -150.1% |
| 2023 | 0.0366 % change on previous year | -96.3% |
| 2024 | -0.3656 % change on previous year | -1099.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.7373 % change on previous year | -27.27 % change on previous year | 37.5 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 6.7 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 30.43 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.04 % change on previous year | -14.29 % change on previous year | 16.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 12.02 % change on previous year | -40 % change on previous year | 66.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.07 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 60 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.53 % change on previous year | -13.88 % change on previous year | 19.84 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0598 % change on previous year | -1.99 % change on previous year | 1.02 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
- 88 South Africa -0.3101 % change on previous year compare
- 89 Haiti -0.3586 % change on previous year compare
- 90 Australia -0.3608 % change on previous year compare
- 92 Cameroon -0.4068 % change on previous year compare
- 93 Namibia -0.5348 % change on previous year compare
- 94 Mali -0.543 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Tunisia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 18.22 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1029 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 479.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5867 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.293 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 10.29 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 10.29 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Tunisia?
- Cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Tunisia was -0.3656 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 % change on previous year in 1997.
- What is the lowest cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was -40 % change on previous year in 1998.
- How does Tunisia rank for cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Tunisia ranks 91st out of 147 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 111.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cabbages — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cabbages — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cabbages — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.