Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Malaysia
Malaysia: Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate was 38.7 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Malaysia, 1962–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Malaysia stood at 38.7 % change on previous year.
The figure is up 333.4% on the previous year and down 39.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Malaysia peaked at 249.72 % change on previous year in 2010 and was at its lowest, -57.14 % change on previous year, in 1986.
That places Malaysia 4th out of 147 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate in Malaysia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | 0 % change on previous year | — |
| 1964 | 50 % change on previous year | — |
| 1965 | -16.67 % change on previous year | -133.3% |
| 1966 | 20 % change on previous year | -220.0% |
| 1967 | 66.67 % change on previous year | +233.3% |
| 1968 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1969 | 40 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | 7.14 % change on previous year | -82.1% |
| 1971 | 6.67 % change on previous year | -6.7% |
| 1972 | 25 % change on previous year | +275.0% |
| 1973 | -10 % change on previous year | -140.0% |
| 1974 | 11.11 % change on previous year | -211.1% |
| 1975 | 10 % change on previous year | -10.0% |
| 1976 | 31.82 % change on previous year | +218.2% |
| 1977 | -3.45 % change on previous year | -110.8% |
| 1978 | -7.14 % change on previous year | +107.1% |
| 1979 | 15.38 % change on previous year | -315.4% |
| 1980 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1981 | 16.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1982 | 2.86 % change on previous year | -82.9% |
| 1983 | -5.56 % change on previous year | -294.4% |
| 1984 | -2.94 % change on previous year | -47.1% |
| 1985 | -15.15 % change on previous year | +415.2% |
| 1986 | -57.14 % change on previous year | +277.1% |
| 1987 | 116.67 % change on previous year | -304.2% |
| 1988 | -23.08 % change on previous year | -119.8% |
| 1989 | 20 % change on previous year | -186.7% |
| 1990 | 8.33 % change on previous year | -58.3% |
| 1991 | 15.38 % change on previous year | +84.6% |
| 1992 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1993 | -11.87 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | 3.56 % change on previous year | -130.0% |
| 1995 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1996 | 44.92 % change on previous year | — |
| 1997 | 16.28 % change on previous year | -63.8% |
| 1998 | 12.48 % change on previous year | -23.3% |
| 1999 | -7.51 % change on previous year | -160.2% |
| 2000 | -42.92 % change on previous year | +471.1% |
| 2001 | -40.58 % change on previous year | -5.4% |
| 2002 | 34.15 % change on previous year | -184.2% |
| 2003 | 37.36 % change on previous year | +9.4% |
| 2004 | 20 % change on previous year | -46.5% |
| 2005 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 2006 | -8.06 % change on previous year | — |
| 2007 | 2.72 % change on previous year | -133.8% |
| 2008 | 2.94 % change on previous year | +8.2% |
| 2009 | -19.66 % change on previous year | -768.3% |
| 2010 | 249.72 % change on previous year | -1370.4% |
| 2011 | 15.03 % change on previous year | -94.0% |
| 2012 | -37.62 % change on previous year | -350.3% |
| 2013 | 37.33 % change on previous year | -199.2% |
| 2014 | 63.82 % change on previous year | +71.0% |
| 2015 | 4.08 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 2016 | -54.32 % change on previous year | -1430.6% |
| 2017 | -13.12 % change on previous year | -75.9% |
| 2018 | 0.6404 % change on previous year | -104.9% |
| 2019 | -2.24 % change on previous year | -450.1% |
| 2020 | -0.279 % change on previous year | -87.6% |
| 2021 | 22.23 % change on previous year | -8066.7% |
| 2022 | 7.07 % change on previous year | -68.2% |
| 2023 | -16.58 % change on previous year | -334.5% |
| 2024 | 38.7 % change on previous year | -333.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20 % change on previous year | -16.67 % change on previous year | 66.67 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 8.65 % change on previous year | -10 % change on previous year | 31.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.23 % change on previous year | -57.14 % change on previous year | 116.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.16 % change on previous year | -11.87 % change on previous year | 44.92 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.4 % change on previous year | -42.92 % change on previous year | 37.36 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 26.33 % change on previous year | -54.32 % change on previous year | 249.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 10.23 % change on previous year | -16.58 % change on previous year | 38.7 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Malaysia
- 1 Denmark 104 % change on previous year compare
- 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % change on previous year compare
- 3 Antigua and Barbuda 50 % change on previous year compare
- 5 Uzbekistan 34.07 % change on previous year compare
- 6 New Zealand 25.69 % change on previous year compare
- 7 Slovenia 19.35 % change on previous year compare
More agriculture & rural data for Malaysia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 13.04 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0822 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 1,078 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.913 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.2261 units per person (2025)
- Agriculture share gdp 8.22 (2025)
- Value added in the agricultural sector as of gdp vs gdp per capita 8.22 (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 1.1% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.3% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Malaysia?
- Cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate in Malaysia was 38.7 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Malaysia?
- The highest recorded value was 249.72 % change on previous year in 2010.
- What is the lowest cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate recorded in Malaysia?
- The lowest recorded value was -57.14 % change on previous year in 1986.
- How does Malaysia rank for cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate?
- Malaysia ranks 4th out of 147 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cabbages — area harvested, annual growth rate rising or falling in Malaysia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 39.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malaysia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Cabbages — Area harvested, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Cabbages — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Cabbages — Area harvested Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cabbages — Area harvested. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.