Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre in Tunisia
Tunisia: Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre was 4.06 No per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4.06 No per square kilometre
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
31st
of 102 countries
All-time high
4.18 No per square kilometre
in 2020
All-time low
0.2897 No per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre in Tunisia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Tunisia is 4.06 No per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 6.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Tunisia peaked at 4.18 No per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.2897 No per square kilometre, in 1961.
Tunisia ranks 31st of 102 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre in Tunisia, year by year
| Year | No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2897 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.2961 No per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1963 | 0.3025 No per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1964 | 0.3077 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1965 | 0.309 No per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 1966 | 0.309 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.3154 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1968 | 0.3218 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1969 | 0.3154 No per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1970 | 0.3218 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1971 | 0.3218 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1972 | 0.3347 No per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1973 | 0.3411 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1974 | 0.3444 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 1975 | 0.3669 No per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1976 | 0.3926 No per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1977 | 0.4184 No per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1978 | 0.4441 No per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1979 | 0.4699 No per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1980 | 0.4828 No per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1981 | 0.5124 No per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1982 | 0.5381 No per square kilometre | +5.0% |
| 1983 | 0.5471 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1984 | 0.5536 No per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 1985 | 0.5664 No per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1986 | 0.5857 No per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 1987 | 0.6244 No per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1988 | 0.6437 No per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1989 | 0.766 No per square kilometre | +19.0% |
| 1990 | 0.7949 No per square kilometre | +3.8% |
| 1991 | 0.8239 No per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1992 | 0.8496 No per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1993 | 1.06 No per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 1994 | 1.29 No per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1995 | 1.52 No per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1996 | 1.74 No per square kilometre | +14.8% |
| 1997 | 1.64 No per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 1998 | 1.57 No per square kilometre | -4.3% |
| 1999 | 1.56 No per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2000 | 1.9 No per square kilometre | +21.4% |
| 2001 | 1.96 No per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2002 | 2.01 No per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2003 | 2.02 No per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2004 | 2.28 No per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 2005 | 2.77 No per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 2006 | 3.11 No per square kilometre | +12.3% |
| 2007 | 3.08 No per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2008 | 3.01 No per square kilometre | -2.3% |
| 2009 | 3.57 No per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 2010 | 3.26 No per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 2011 | 3.79 No per square kilometre | +16.2% |
| 2012 | 3.79 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 3.8 No per square kilometre | +0.2% |
| 2014 | 3.79 No per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2015 | 4.01 No per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2016 | 3.87 No per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2017 | 4 No per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2018 | 3.97 No per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2019 | 4.05 No per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2020 | 4.18 No per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 2021 | 4.11 No per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 2022 | 4.06 No per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2023 | 4.06 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
Tunisia compared with similar countries
- Tunisia's 4.06 No per square kilometre is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.9191 No per square kilometre, 4.4× the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Tunisia's 4.06 No per square kilometre is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 0.6173 No per square kilometre, 6.6× the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3074 No per square kilometre | 0.2897 No per square kilometre | 0.3218 No per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.3756 No per square kilometre | 0.3218 No per square kilometre | 0.4699 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.582 No per square kilometre | 0.4828 No per square kilometre | 0.766 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.29 No per square kilometre | 0.7949 No per square kilometre | 1.74 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.57 No per square kilometre | 1.9 No per square kilometre | 3.57 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.83 No per square kilometre | 3.26 No per square kilometre | 4.05 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.1 No per square kilometre | 4.06 No per square kilometre | 4.18 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tunisia
More agriculture & rural data for Tunisia
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual 18.22 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.1029 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 479.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -0.5867 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.293 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 10.3% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 10.3% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.3% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 1.4% (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Tunisia?
- Bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Tunisia was 4.06 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest bees — stocks, per square kilometre recorded in Tunisia?
- The highest recorded value was 4.18 No per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest bees — stocks, per square kilometre recorded in Tunisia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2897 No per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Tunisia rank for bees — stocks, per square kilometre?
- Tunisia ranks 31st out of 102 countries with data for 2023.
- Is bees — stocks, per square kilometre rising or falling in Tunisia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tunisia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Bees — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Bees — Stocks ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Bees — Stocks Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Bees — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.