Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre in Chile
Chile: Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre was 0.5486 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre in Chile, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in No per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Chile stood at 0.5486 No per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.7% on the previous year and down 15.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Chile peaked at 0.6994 No per square kilometre in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.4254 No per square kilometre, in 2014.
Chile ranks 67th of 102 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre in Chile, year by year
| Year | No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.5738 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.5828 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1963 | 0.5918 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 1964 | 0.6097 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1965 | 0.4662 No per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1966 | 0.538 No per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1967 | 0.4931 No per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 1968 | 0.4842 No per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1969 | 0.4878 No per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 1970 | 0.5111 No per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 1971 | 0.5434 No per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 1972 | 0.5649 No per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1973 | 0.5703 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1974 | 0.5703 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1975 | 0.5971 No per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1976 | 0.6308 No per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1977 | 0.6711 No per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1978 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1979 | 0.6321 No per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 1980 | 0.6388 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1981 | 0.6456 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 1982 | 0.6456 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1983 | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1984 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1985 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1987 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1988 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.538 No per square kilometre | -18.4% |
| 1998 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +22.5% |
| 1999 | 0.659 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 0.6657 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2001 | 0.6725 No per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2002 | 0.6859 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2003 | 0.6994 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2004 | 0.6994 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.6994 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.6994 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.6133 No per square kilometre | -12.3% |
| 2008 | 0.6551 No per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2009 | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2010 | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.4254 No per square kilometre | -34.8% |
| 2015 | 0.5522 No per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 2016 | 0.5434 No per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2017 | 0.5483 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2018 | 0.5599 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2019 | 0.5624 No per square kilometre | +0.4% |
| 2020 | 0.5623 No per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.5574 No per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.5525 No per square kilometre | -0.9% |
| 2023 | 0.5486 No per square kilometre | -0.7% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 0.5486 No per square kilometre is below the median for high income countries, which is 3.09 No per square kilometre, 18% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
- Chile's 0.5486 No per square kilometre is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.9135 No per square kilometre, 60% of the median. (20 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre in Chile changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | -34.8% | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | 0.4254 No per square kilometre |
| 2015 | +29.8% | 0.4254 No per square kilometre | 0.5522 No per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.5364 No per square kilometre | 0.4662 No per square kilometre | 0.6097 No per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.595 No per square kilometre | 0.5111 No per square kilometre | 0.6711 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.6536 No per square kilometre | 0.6388 No per square kilometre | 0.659 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6469 No per square kilometre | 0.538 No per square kilometre | 0.659 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.6742 No per square kilometre | 0.6133 No per square kilometre | 0.6994 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5801 No per square kilometre | 0.4254 No per square kilometre | 0.6523 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5552 No per square kilometre | 0.5486 No per square kilometre | 0.5623 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 64 Egypt 0.7341 No per square kilometre compare
- 65 Fiji 0.6799 No per square kilometre compare
- 66 Cameroon 0.6533 No per square kilometre compare
- 68 New Caledonia 0.5456 No per square kilometre compare
- 69 Japan 0.5442 No per square kilometre compare
- 70 Pakistan 0.5005 No per square kilometre compare
More agriculture & rural data for Chile
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -2.03 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0345 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 621.34 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, annual growth rate -1.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0.1082 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 3.5% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 3.5% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 4.7% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.7% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Chile?
- Bees — stocks, per square kilometre in Chile was 0.5486 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest bees — stocks, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6994 No per square kilometre in 2003.
- What is the lowest bees — stocks, per square kilometre recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4254 No per square kilometre in 2014.
- How does Chile rank for bees — stocks, per square kilometre?
- Chile ranks 67th out of 102 countries with data for 2023.
- Is bees — stocks, per square kilometre rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 15.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Bees — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Bees — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Bees — Stocks ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Bees — Stocks Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Bees — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.