Statizoid

Beer — Residuals in Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea: Beer — Residuals was 0 1000 t in 2023. ▬ Flat

Latest (2023)
0 1000 t
World rank
1st
of 164 countries
All-time high
0 1000 t
in 2010
All-time low
0 1000 t
in 2010
Years of data
14
2010–2023

Beer — Residuals in Papua New Guinea, 2010–2023

00.20.40.60.812010201620232010: 0 1000 t2011: 0 1000 t2012: 0 1000 t2013: 0 1000 t2014: 0 1000 t2015: 0 1000 t2016: 0 1000 t2017: 0 1000 t2018: 0 1000 t2019: 0 1000 t2020: 0 1000 t2021: 0 1000 t2022: 0 1000 t2023: 0 1000 t

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 t.

Analysis

Papua New Guinea recorded 0 1000 t for beer — residuals in 2023. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Over the whole period, beer — residuals in Papua New Guinea peaked at 0 1000 t in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 t, in 2010.

Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 164 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 10
2020s 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 0 1000 t 4

Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea

  1. 1 Tuvalu 0 1000 t compare
  2. 1 Naoero, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  3. 1 Tonga 0 1000 t compare
  4. 1 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 0 1000 t compare
  5. 1 Bhutan 0 1000 t compare
  6. 1 Qatar 0 1000 t compare
  7. 1 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  8. 1 Cuba 0 1000 t compare
  9. 1 Turkmenistan 0 1000 t compare
  10. 1 Kiribati 0 1000 t compare
  11. 1 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  12. 1 Guinea-Bissau 0 1000 t compare
  13. 1 Comoros, Union of the 0 1000 t compare
  14. 1 Djibouti 0 1000 t compare
  15. 1 São Tomé and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  16. 1 Liberia 0 1000 t compare
  17. 1 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  18. 1 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  19. 1 China, Macao SAR 0 1000 t compare
  20. 1 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  21. 1 Mongolia 0 1000 t compare
  22. 1 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 1000 t compare
  23. 1 Gambia, The 0 1000 t compare
  24. 1 Solomon Islands 0 1000 t compare
  25. 1 Albania 0 1000 t compare
  26. 1 Libya 0 1000 t compare
  27. 1 Sierra Leone 0 1000 t compare
  28. 1 Suriname 0 1000 t compare
  29. 1 Vanuatu 0 1000 t compare
  30. 1 Montenegro 0 1000 t compare
  31. 1 Armenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  32. 1 Kuwait 0 1000 t compare
  33. 1 Maldives 0 1000 t compare
  34. 1 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 1000 t compare
  35. 1 Kyrgyz Republic 0 1000 t compare
  36. 1 Iceland 0 1000 t compare
  37. 1 Gabon 0 1000 t compare
  38. 1 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  39. 1 Haiti 0 1000 t compare
  40. 1 Estonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  41. 1 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 1000 t compare
  42. 1 Seychelles 0 1000 t compare
  43. 1 French Polynesia 0 1000 t compare
  44. 1 Guinea 0 1000 t compare
  45. 1 Samoa 0 1000 t compare
  46. 1 Lithuania, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  47. 1 Guyana 0 1000 t compare
  48. 1 Oman 0 1000 t compare
  49. 1 Georgia 0 1000 t compare
  50. 1 Grenada 0 1000 t compare
  51. 1 Angola 0 1000 t compare
  52. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 1000 t compare
  53. 1 Jordan 0 1000 t compare
  54. 1 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  55. 1 Iraq 0 1000 t compare
  56. 1 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  57. 1 Congo, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  58. 1 Finland 0 1000 t compare
  59. 1 Niger 0 1000 t compare
  60. 1 Belarus, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  61. 1 Paraguay 0 1000 t compare
  62. 1 Saudi Arabia 0 1000 t compare
  63. 1 Bahamas, The 0 1000 t compare
  64. 1 Uruguay 0 1000 t compare
  65. 1 St. Lucia 0 1000 t compare
  66. 1 New Caledonia 0 1000 t compare
  67. 1 Namibia 0 1000 t compare
  68. 1 Latvia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  69. 1 Slovak Republic 0 1000 t compare
  70. 1 Algeria 0 1000 t compare
  71. 1 Luxembourg 0 1000 t compare
  72. 1 Ukraine 0 1000 t compare
  73. 1 Burkina Faso 0 1000 t compare
  74. 1 Chile 0 1000 t compare
  75. 1 Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  76. 1 Norway 0 1000 t compare
  77. 1 Barbados 0 1000 t compare
  78. 1 Croatia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  79. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 0 1000 t compare
  80. 1 Serbia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  81. 1 Argentina 0 1000 t compare
  82. 1 Czech Republic 0 1000 t compare
  83. 1 Tunisia 0 1000 t compare
  84. 1 Panama 0 1000 t compare
  85. 1 Myanmar 0 1000 t compare
  86. 1 Israel 0 1000 t compare
  87. 1 Slovenia, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  88. 1 Nicaragua 0 1000 t compare
  89. 1 Belgium 0 1000 t compare
  90. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 0 1000 t compare
  91. 1 Bulgaria 0 1000 t compare
  92. 1 Yemen, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  93. 1 Rwanda 0 1000 t compare
  94. 1 Poland, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  95. 1 Switzerland 0 1000 t compare
  96. 1 Denmark 0 1000 t compare
  97. 1 Romania 0 1000 t compare
  98. 1 Mauritius 0 1000 t compare
  99. 1 Belize 0 1000 t compare
  100. 1 Dominican Republic 0 1000 t compare
  101. 1 El Salvador 0 1000 t compare
  102. 1 Portugal 0 1000 t compare
  103. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 0 1000 t compare
  104. 1 Russian Federation 0 1000 t compare
  105. 1 Jamaica 0 1000 t compare
  106. 1 Zambia 0 1000 t compare
  107. 1 Malawi 0 1000 t compare
  108. 1 Mozambique, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  109. 1 New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  110. 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 0 1000 t compare
  111. 1 Canada 0 1000 t compare
  112. 1 Lebanon 0 1000 t compare
  113. 1 Austria 0 1000 t compare
  114. 1 Madagascar, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  115. 1 Sweden 0 1000 t compare
  116. 1 Malta 0 1000 t compare
  117. 1 France 0 1000 t compare
  118. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 0 1000 t compare
  119. 1 United Arab Emirates 0 1000 t compare
  120. 1 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  121. 1 Malaysia 0 1000 t compare
  122. 1 Ghana 0 1000 t compare
  123. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 0 1000 t compare
  124. 1 Senegal 0 1000 t compare
  125. 1 Ecuador 0 1000 t compare
  126. 1 Botswana 0 1000 t compare
  127. 1 Fiji, Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  128. 1 Hungary 0 1000 t compare
  129. 1 Australia 0 1000 t compare
  130. 1 Morocco 0 1000 t compare
  131. 1 Greece 0 1000 t compare
  132. 1 Zimbabwe 0 1000 t compare
  133. 1 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  134. 1 Germany 0 1000 t compare
  135. 1 Bangladesh 0 1000 t compare
  136. 1 Cameroon 0 1000 t compare
  137. 1 Cyprus 0 1000 t compare
  138. 1 Italy 0 1000 t compare
  139. 1 Cambodia 0 1000 t compare
  140. 1 South Africa 0 1000 t compare
  141. 1 Nigeria 0 1000 t compare
  142. 1 Republic of Korea 0 1000 t compare
  143. 1 Pakistan 0 1000 t compare
  144. 1 Philippines 0 1000 t compare
  145. 1 Uganda 0 1000 t compare
  146. 1 Sri Lanka 0 1000 t compare
  147. 1 Costa Rica 0 1000 t compare
  148. 1 Honduras 0 1000 t compare
  149. 1 Peru 0 1000 t compare
  150. 1 Spain 0 1000 t compare
  151. 1 India 0 1000 t compare
  152. 1 Brazil 0 1000 t compare
  153. 1 Thailand 0 1000 t compare
  154. 1 Mexico 0 1000 t compare
  155. 1 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 1000 t compare
  156. 1 China, mainland 0 1000 t compare
  157. 1 Colombia 0 1000 t compare
  158. 1 Australia and New Zealand 0 1000 t compare
  159. 1 Guatemala 0 1000 t compare
  160. 1 Indonesia 0 1000 t compare
  161. 1 Nepal 0 1000 t compare
  162. 1 Kenya 0 1000 t compare
  163. 1 China, People's Republic of 0 1000 t compare

See the full ranking of 213 places →

More agriculture & rural data for Papua New Guinea

All data for Papua New Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is beer — residuals in Papua New Guinea?
Beer — residuals in Papua New Guinea was 0 1000 t in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest beer — residuals recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
What is the lowest beer — residuals recorded in Papua New Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 t in 2010.
How does Papua New Guinea rank for beer — residuals?
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Beer — Residuals. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Beer — Residuals in Papua New Guinea. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/beer-residuals/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/stat/beer-residuals/papua-new-guinea/">Beer — Residuals in Papua New Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Beer — Residuals
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 2,892 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.