Bananas — Yield, per unit of GDP in Singapore
Singapore: Bananas — Yield, per unit of GDP was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1991. ◆ Volatile
Bananas — Yield, per unit of GDP in Singapore, 1961–1991
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kg/ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 1991, bananas — yield, per unit of gdp in Singapore stood at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 31 years on record.
That represents a change of down 25.5% on the previous year and down 71.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, bananas — yield, per unit of gdp in Singapore peaked at 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, in 1991.
That places Singapore 85th out of 107 countries with data for 1991, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Bananas — Yield, per unit of GDP in Singapore, year by year
| Year | kg/ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 1963 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 1964 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 1965 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 1966 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -11.1% |
| 1967 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1968 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1969 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 1970 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -13.6% |
| 1971 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 1972 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +9.5% |
| 1973 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +49.2% |
| 1974 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -29.6% |
| 1975 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -1.8% |
| 1976 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.7% |
| 1977 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -51.0% |
| 1978 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
| 1979 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -19.5% |
| 1980 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 1981 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.9% |
| 1982 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1983 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 1984 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -10.6% |
| 1985 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1986 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 1987 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1988 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -15.4% |
| 1989 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -24.8% |
| 1990 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1991 | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
Singapore compared with similar countries
- Singapore's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for high income countries, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 51% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Singapore's 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP, 36% of the median. (19 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Bananas — Yield, per unit of GDP in Singapore changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1973 | +49.2% | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP | 2 |
Countries ranked near Singapore
More agriculture & rural data for Singapore
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), annual -1.4 % change on previous year (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Agriculture, forestry, and fishing, value added (current US$), per 24.33 current US$ per person (2025)
- Rural population, per unit of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Rural population, per capita 0 units per person (2025)
- Share of GDP from agriculture 0.0% (2025)
- Agriculture as a share of GDP vs. GDP per capita 0.0% (2025)
- Agricultural raw materials exports 0.4% (2024)
- Agricultural raw materials imports 0.2% (2024)
- Rural population 0.0% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is bananas — yield, per unit of gdp in Singapore?
- Bananas — yield, per unit of gdp in Singapore was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1991, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest bananas — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Singapore?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest bananas — yield, per unit of gdp recorded in Singapore?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kg/ha per US$ of GDP in 1991.
- How does Singapore rank for bananas — yield, per unit of gdp?
- Singapore ranks 85th out of 107 countries with data for 1991.
- Is bananas — yield, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Singapore?
- Over the last ten years it is down 71.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Singapore data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Bananas — Yield, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Bananas — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Bananas — Yield ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Bananas — Yield Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Bananas — Yield divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.